Pros
- The lens has the following advantages: price, weight, optical characteristics
Cons
- It doesn't look solid :)), 5 aperture blades are not enough! , buzzing like a Chinese toy! misses often.
Pros
- – Price – Good image quality
Cons
- – Constructive
Pros
- Sharpness, perfectly washes the background, low price - it's not a pity.
Cons
- manufacturing accuracy of the autofocus drive, low focusing motor speed, "nuts" in the bokeh
Pros
- price tag Dimensions The weight Picture quality Aperture
Cons
- solid plastic Noisy (sound, not picture) Dimensions (its cons) flimsy
Pros
- Good price, aperture, size and weight, easy manual focus ring, bokeh.
Cons
- Sharpness appears only from F2.5, Capricious autofocus, fragile constructive.
Pros
- 1. A very affordable optical quality autofocus lens. Easy to take for a beginner mirrorer to try. 2. Optically - a very good typical fifty-kopeck 50mm f/1.8. It doesn’t soft on the open, the matrix allows, but excellent micro-contrast is achieved somewhere with f / 2.5. It doesn't vignette on crop, on full frame it vignettes noticeably up to about f/2.5 - f/2.8, then it's almost invisible. Maximum sharpness is achieved at f/5.6 - f/8.0. Easily resolves the most multi-megapixel matrices of both cropped and full-frame cameras. The bokeh is quite tangible, noticeable, rather soft - without hard highlights, but nothing more. However, it is quite pleasant to use it in portrait photography. The color reproduction is quite decent, quite neutral, the colors are good, not faded. CA (chromatic aberration) is practically not observed. In terms of optical characteristics, it surpasses almost all zooms set at 50 mm focal length, and does not lag behind very expensive L (actually 24-70 / 2.8, the rest at this focal length are even darker). 3. Lightweight, compact.
Cons
- 1. When compared in terms of optical characteristics, it is inferior to Canon EF 50 mm f/1.4 USM - fifty dollars 50/1.4 is already starting to have good micro-contrast from f/2.0 - f/2.2. The bokeh of any 50 / 1.4 is usually softer, smoother, more beautiful. In general, optically 50 / 1.8 at the same apertures is the same in sharpness as 50 / 1.4, but inferior to it in bokeh pattern. Here, the bokeh sometimes twists, sometimes slightly ripples, and a bright border is often visible near the light spots in the bokeh from light sources outside the depth of field. The difference in optics is not very big, but it is noticeable. 2. Weak, rather flimsy design, plastic mount. Not the most reliable machine. 3. Noisy autofocus. Plus, he's not fast. The step of the micromotor is rough and often the lens does not focus very accurately at distances of ~ 3-6 meters. There is no way to manually focus when autofocus is on. The focus ring even rotates when autofocus is working. 4. A five-blade aperture 50/1.8 at f/2.8 - f/5.6 can easily make noticeable pentagons-"nuts" from point light sources in bokeh.
Pros
- 1. The design is "a lens hood to itself" - no parasitic light, no touching the glass with your fingers. 2. a rare super cheap diaphragm that draws bokeh not in circles, but in hellishly unusual, and therefore artistic bees 3. sharp. like 50 1.4, only without 1.4 =) 4. the construct is very strong - here at fifty dollars 1.4 there are a lot of reviews "hit. broke the YSM motor. repaired for five pieces." this one has a bunch of reviews "hit. fell into two halves. terrible plastic guts inside. inserted one into the other and again into battle." although I myself, no matter how much I beat fifty dollars against the beams of attics under the roofs, he generally doesn’t give a damn. 5. it looks very short - no one will perceive it as a professional photographer even if you put it on 5d mk.2
Cons
- 1. the construct is, as it were, strong, but sometimes it is not clear how it is alive at all - the insides are entirely plastic, something always dangles inside it, when focusing it buzzes with the sound of friction plastic-on-plastic, sometimes the limit (macro) slips with a loud crack focus point and immediately returns to the desired position with the same bang. but still it is absolutely accurate in focus and absolutely sharp. 2. looks very short - it's a shame to get in a crowded place, it seems that I'm not a man.
Pros
- - PRICE (although I bought this device for as much as 4500, you can find it cheaper); - aperture ratio (see also drawback); - on the crop, a good "portrait" turned out (not without flaws, of course); - EF mount (if I suddenly buy FF, it will go there as well); - due to the design, it is very light (see disadvantage); - compared to kit 18-55, the colors are simply gorgeous; - look cool on the camera;
Cons
- - completely plastic, and the mount itself (see advantages); - after all, at 1.8 it lathers a little (on 2.8 the picture is already clear); - in the conditions of an apartment (namely an apartment, not a huge country house), such a focal length on the crop is of course large, not everything fits in the photo (on the street it’s just perfect, a small zoom with your feet); - as already mentioned, it misses the focus (well, it happens, and what can you do now, you saw the price, it's not fatal)
Pros
- Benefits for the face: - Aperture (in low light conditions, the shots are excellent, pretty sharp). Shooting a portrait in the lights of big city streets is just a fairy tale! =) - Enough bright, colorful and saturated colors. - Price!
Cons
- So far I haven't noticed one. Yes, and it’s a sin to look for them and poke your fingers into the shortcomings of the lens for SUCH a price (I took a new one for 4100) .
Pros
- no obvious
Cons
- does not catch autofocus well, the motor makes a loud noise, flimsy design
Pros
- Sharpness, dimensions, weight, price
Cons
- Plastic and build quality, no hood included, no USM
Pros
- Price bokeh Aperture sharpness
Cons
- autofocus
Pros
- Lightweight, small in size, aperture, of course the price!, Pretty tenacious autofocus.
Cons
- It buzzes when autofocus is working, the manual focus ring is not very convenient, but with some training this drawback is leveled.
Pros
- low cost and constant availability of used models for sale.
Cons
- fragile! be very careful - you can not drop even from a small height.
Pros
- Aperture, sharpness, light weight, quite nice picture on the open aperture. Ridiculous price. Prevalence in the secondary market: easy to find and just as easy to sell if you don’t like it.
Cons
- On some (not all) carcasses it can be soft at f / 1.8 - not everyone likes it and is not always appropriate. The five petals make the bokeh quite "hard" at a covered aperture. Absolutely not convenient manual focus ring. Quite loud buzzing :)
Pros
- low cost, fairly high-quality output image, aperture
Cons
- low quality plastic
Pros
- Extreme aperture and picture quality for ultra-small money.
Cons
- I assure you there are none. There are only high expectations.
Pros
- Aperture. Price. Light.
Cons
- For its price, the disadvantages are insignificant.
Pros
- PRICE !, aperture, fast autofocus, although not USM, light, small, convenient for the street or FR office
Cons
- no at this price
Pros
- Price (bought on stock for 2300). Aperture 1.8. Nimble. Small.
Cons
- There is no sense of security. Noisier than a whale. Autofocus when shooting handheld often smears on large holes.
