Header banner
Revain logoHome Page

Reviews

Global ratings 38
  • 5
    30
  • 4
    4
  • 3
    3
  • 2
    1
  • 1
    1

Type of review

Revainrating 3 out of 5

Not the best quality, but generally not bad.

I was once more persuaded of a straightforward guideline that applies to those who, like me, cannot afford premium tires: *for summer, you must choose summer tires from the category of strong medium peasants; *for winter, a little higher than a strong average. Renault cheated by installing winter / summer tires to solve the issue. Do not purchase if someone is trying to buy THIS rubber on purpose! This tire is a compromise since it retains the road in both the summer and the winter but performs

Pros
  • 215/65r16 When I purchased the Duster in October 2022, I stood on it. It maintains the normal flow of traffic; occasionally, I consider the track. At 103–107 km/h, aquaplaning occurs (never noticed).
Cons
  • a year of skating. It is not advised during the winter. There are usually stones in the tread, measuring d = 8–10 mm, which is an unrecoverable defect. There was an exclusively winter-themed Velcro GoodYear UG Ice 2 before this one. I won't compare since there is no comparison. Personally, I blame the extremely ordinary quality of this rubber on the off-season. And it won't be summer + the snow will briefly cover the mountains.

Revainrating 5 out of 5

The best purchase in my life, I will definitely buy it again.

I acquired these tires to replace the similar tires of a prior generation that had failed shortly after being placed at the factory. They had planned to drive during the summer season and possibly ride during the following one, but unhappily, in the dark, they flew into a tiny but deep trench that the unfortunate builders left in the center of the road when they were fixing it. As a result, they almost lost their resource. They planned to drive during the summer season and possibly ride during…

Pros
  • It is very good at riding both on asphalt and on the ground, particularly muddy ones. It is quiet, it completely eliminates water from under the contact patch, it has robust and strong sidewalls, and it has a good tread pattern.
Cons
  • The cost is prohibitive.

Revainrating 5 out of 5

The purchase brought only positive emotions.

Purchased in size 225/65R17 for use on a Rav-4. When it left the factory in its usual configuration, the car had a Bridgestone 687 mounted on it. I put it on the car in April and assumed I would be able to make it through the entire summer on it, but in June I made the decision to replace the tires with new ones. When you switch tires from one summer to the next, you get a better idea of the benefits and drawbacks of each option. After leaving the tire shop, the first thing that was instantly…

Pros
  • Very comfortable, quiet tire. Excellent handling both on dry and wet pavement. It has adequate performance for use on gravel roads and modest off-road terrain.
Cons
  • Still haven't been able to locate it.

Good quality tire; no complaints. When the first half hour was up and the shoes were back on, there was a terrifying sensation that the car had fallen into oil. An emphasis on engine noise developed. Also a "minus": I wouldn't take it to a game of checkers on the Hong Kong Ring Road because of its slow stopping speed and lackluster side-to-side stability. Bad pavement in the province, but a grader to the country makes for a peaceful commute. Michelin latitude sport tires were used on the…

Pros
  • Quiet. Tires normally strain to see asphalt joints, but this one does not. A rolled grader is nothing more than a natural substance. Accurate draining.
Cons
  • The "sport" tires don't stop as well as the regular ones. Making drastic adjustments was terrifying. Gas / brake 150km/h fans are ineffective.

Dimension 225/65R17 on Mazda CX-5. Before I joined Kontik, I made an effort to get Michelin Latitude Tour HP for each of my vehicles. I advocated for this brand to each of my coworkers, and I was successful in this endeavor. Because of the price tag, at the moment it falls into the category of items that are contemplated but not purchased. I purchased LX2 with apprehension because the price tag is not significantly lower and it is unclear how it will demonstrate itself. There were instances of…

Pros
  • Comfortable in terms of its softness, tenacity, and the fact that it either does not detect the track or, even if it does notice it, does not burst out of it and almost never squeals when turning.
Cons
  • The resistance to wear is uncertain; according to the recollection, only 30,000 kilometers were driven on FF2 PremiumContact tires before they were discarded entirely after one season of use.

Revainrating 5 out of 5

I do not cease to rejoice at the purchase, a very good deal!

When I use the tire on my TLK 200 in places where the asphalt is nonexistent or severely lacking, it performs admirably. Going off-road instantly revealed the tire's superior comfort, since it "smoothes out" road imperfections more effectively. TLK 200's upgraded suspension benefits greatly from this. Tires were tested on sand and primer at high speeds. This is what I suggest.

Pros
  • These tires are quiet and pleasant. Superior control in both dry and rainy conditions. It's adequate for use on gravel roads and mild off-roading. When I switched from the BFG All Terrain KO2 285/60R18 to the Conti CrossContact LX2 285/60R18, I found that the latter truly comprehended the meaning of comfort and silence.
Cons
  • Not able to locate them while in use.

Revainrating 5 out of 5

The perfect product for any user!

Choosing replacement tires for my Tiguan AD1 was a major source of stress for me. I was looking for something that may appeal to a wide audience without sacrificing audio quality. I'd prefer it if it were softer, too. Such a car and you feel the booty the whole way thanks to the combination of the native dimension 215/65/17 and the stiff suspension. 225/65/17 tires worked great on my second-generation Tiguan, thus I think this info is useful. See image for clarification. Finalized the…

Pros
  • Calm, gentle, and cozy

The options for tires in the size 275/65 R17 are limited. Michelin's innovative tread design scared them off, Nokian's SUV came first, and the Japanese were instantly rejected for their renowned stiffness. After much deliberation and a fruitless search for evaluations, I went with the Conti and have never looked back. This is despite the fact that the car, being a heavy 4x4, spends 99.9% of its time on asphalt. The car was noticeably quieter after Nokian (who is rather a powerful middle…

Pros
  • Very peaceful, spacious, and secure on the road.
Cons
  • Price.

Revainrating 5 out of 5

A good quality product, I rate this purchase perfectly.

Tire wear has reached an unacceptable level on the previous set (Bridgestone Dueler 697 A / T), hence a change is in order. To fit my car, I have to choose between TOYO and DUNLOP or a European brand, but despite their quality, Japanese tires are noisy and rough. I settled on the Continental ContiCrossContact LX2 after reading numerous positive reviews. I, for one, am a buyer. There was food, a broad grin, silence, softness, a roll, and nothing but a fantastic story. What's great is that…

Pros
  • The road noise is minimal, it rides over potholes and other road imperfections smoothly, and the handling is superb in wet conditions. It appears to be of good quality, both visually and tactilely.
Cons
  • failed to disclose

Revainrating 5 out of 5

The quality is at the level, I am satisfied with everything.

I sought the opinion of experts before making a purchase. My travels consist of primarily urban areas (80%) and rural areas (20%). I was hoping to find tires identical to those, so that driving on asphalt was comfortable and primers presented little danger. This design came highly suggested by good friends. They reported that the tires performed well on both paved roads and mild off-road terrain. According to my friends and the reviews on this site, as well as my own experience with the tires…

Pros
  • These tires provide a very quiet ride, both outside and inside the vehicle.
Cons
  • Couldn't locate

Revainrating 5 out of 5

The quality is at the highest level, be sure to try it.

I installed the tires on a Mazda CX-5, and the vehicle's performance after switching to the standard tires significantly improved. The vehicle also became somewhat elastic on them, and even though their tread height is only 65%, they have excellent handling and a smooth road. In other words, I am happy with my purchase and would recommend it to you without reservation. As I utilize it, I'll try to add a review.

Pros
  • Despite having such a protection, they are: 1. Moderately soft; 2. Quiet; 3. Excellent to handle; and 4. Moderately versatile. 5. Expertly made.
Cons
  • The tread can occasionally cause stones to become caught, however this is not crucial

Revainrating 3 out of 5

The product can be used, I expected a little more.

I drove one set of earlier LXs for nine years prior to these LX2s; other than the much increased noise, there are no behavioral variations. I regret purchasing it because the tire buzz is quite bothersome when I'm traveling at 110–120 km/h on the highway (I recently returned from a journey down the M4). different benefits Pretty soft. Normal irregularities occur (although I have a large size of 215x65R16). Everything on a typical road, including handling, braking, rut stability, and rolling, is

Revainrating 5 out of 5

The best I ever used, recommend it to everybody.

Unparalleled levels of riding comfort. Size 225\65 17, pressure 2.2, automobile ford kuga. Makes it possible for you to "fly" over the asphalt at a speed of at least 100 km/h without experiencing any discomfort, even when passing through the fields that are located beside the trail. During the previous rubber, I was compelled to travel along the same road (heading toward Peno from Ostashkov), but I could only do it at a snail's pace while keeping both hands on the steering wheel. Now it feels…

Pros
  • Incredible in its level of comfort, long-lasting, and silent.
Cons
  • When traveling at speeds more than 87 miles per hour (140 kilometers per hour), it is nerve-wracking to enter abrupt curves because the vehicle rolls.

Revainrating 4 out of 5

No minuses as such, comfortable to use.

Acquired on the Niva, with a 90% asphalt, 10% off-road computation. Naturally, the tires are stylish on asphalt, the Niva has evolved into a more or less comfy vehicle, a roll has appeared, the consumption has decreased slightly, and the asphalt joints are not even noticeable. Off-road, however, is absolutely nothing; the tread pattern clogs up immediately, forcing you to go to drier ground. Despite this assessment, I decided to go with tires, so I don't have any regrets since I still primarily

Pros
  • On wet asphalt, there is no sound at all; it is also incredibly soft and comfy. You enjoy what you consume!
Cons
  • It is dangerous to interfere even in light off-road since it quickly clogs up.

Revainrating 4 out of 5

The right product for me, the price suited me.

After 24.02, the selection of universal tires for the Ixtrail T32 drastically shrank, and prices skyrocketed. While standard rubber will continue to be used for most applications, I have decided to take this rubber in the quantity of 225/65 17 for 10 per cylinder. I put a good ten thousand kilometers on it, and I can't say anything particularly good or negative about it. An effective all-around midrange instrument.

Pros
  • That's it; it's standard issue for getting off the pavement quickly and safely. Simply a bypass for the city or the freeway. The softness and handling of these tires are just what I require. Three of the four tires are balanced to perfection. Treads that are both deep and durable.
Cons
  • Consumption is 0.5l / 100km more than with the preceding Yokohama Geolandar rubber (the industry standard for the x-trail t32), due to the constant obstruction of stones. The tread design is too much like a braided pattern for my taste. It's possible to aquaplane when the tread is worn down to 50% because there are no grooves in the shoulder area, thus water can't drain from under the center of the contact patch to the sides. To top it all off, I had to put on one of the four tires "with an explosion" because it was precariously poised on the rim.

Revainrating 5 out of 5

I didnt expect the quality to be so high.

Size 255 * 65 R17, on a Nissan Pathfinder. Rubber trumps any acclaim. It is now September 18th, 2022, and I purchased tires in the spring. After three seasons of use at an average of 19,000 kilometers per year (for a total of about 57,000 kilometers driven), the tread depth is between 2.5 and 3 millimeters. However, I intend to shop this time next year. Perfectly grips the road, and the wet asphalt "aqua planning" doesn't even seem to mind that it's dry. Approximately 150 km/h generates some…

Pros
  • Resilience and ease of use.
Cons
  • Except for the price, THEY ARE NOT.

Revainrating 5 out of 5

I am very happy with this purchase, I will advise everyone!

The tire was bought as a set 3 years ago for Niva (215/65 R16) - almost not worn out. I had to buy 2 more pieces, because they chewed one, not noticing that it was lowered - we drove 4-5 km like that on it. At the same time, no visible catastrophic damage is visible, only creases, but we decided to buy a new one + for a spare too. I am sure that another 3 years will definitely pass (40-50 thousand km). Weight - 10.5 kg (in the photo in the package, the weight of two tires before sending by 2022

Pros
  • Quality at the highest level. The car rulitsya perfectly and at the same time very comfortable, soft tires even in the hands.
Cons
  • The price is much more expensive than some competitors.