Header banner
Revain logoHome Page
continental conticrosscontact lx2 215/65 r16 98h summer logo

Continental ContiCrossContact LX2 215/65 R16 98H summer Review

38

·

Very good

Revainrating 4.5 out of 5  
Rating 
4.6
Automotive, 🚗 Exterior Car Accessories, 🚛 Truck Bed & Tailgate Accessories, 🚗 Exterior Car Accessories

View on AmazonView on ЯM

Media

(11)
img 1 attached to Continental ContiCrossContact LX2 215/65 R16 98H summer
img 2 attached to Continental ContiCrossContact LX2 215/65 R16 98H summer
img 3 attached to Continental ContiCrossContact LX2 215/65 R16 98H summer
img 4 attached to Continental ContiCrossContact LX2 215/65 R16 98H summer

Description of Continental ContiCrossContact LX2 215/65 R16 98H summer

Like most of the current leaders in the global tire industry, Continental AG, founded in October 1871 in Hannover, started producing not automobile, but bicycle tires, along with molded tires for horse-drawn carriages. A year later, the company acquired a trademark with the image of a rearing horse, for which there is a very logical explanation. It was partly borrowed from the coat of arms of the state of Saxony. Its capital is Hannover, where, as mentioned earlier, the Continental company was formed. In 1892, the company was the first in Germany to start producing pneumatic tires, first for bicy...

Reviews

Global ratings 38
  • 5
    30
  • 4
    4
  • 3
    3
  • 2
    1
  • 1
    1

Type of review

Revainrating 5 out of 5

One of the best offers, glad I bought it.

Chose between Michelin / Nokia / Conti. Nokia was unhappy with the fact that there is no international production available for purchase. The Michelin brand can be quite expensive. The benefits of it include: Configured for use on a Mazda CX5 vehicle. It is simpler to enter curves at speed, and the rearrangement is perceptually easier when compared to the normal Yokohama 98A. The steering wheel is also notably firmer than the standard model, but it provides a great deal more information. Strong

Because of the unpleasant sensation that results from even a slight increase in speed when the vehicle is negotiating a turn or approaching an exit, fast driving is not recommended. With its positives being: I traveled 55,000 kilometers on wet roads and found the stability to be good. Since there is no sign of significant deterioration, I estimate that another 25,000 to 30,000 kilometers will be traveled. Got cons: Weak sidewall if something pointy breaks on the sidewall like paper, sharp…

Revainrating 1 out of 5

Lame product and terrible quality.

Size 225/65/17. Car Toyota RAV 4. Initial impressions about the functioning. The car became like "jelly" in appearance. Hardly any rolling, and a wild aversion to rolling. Ratings and reviews are almost always obviously fabricated, and this is especially true with ratings. A total of 48,000 was thrown away. I was under the assumption that the winter "ice contact 2" tire was the best winter tire I had ever used, which is why I decided to get it.

Pros
  • They are a myth that cannot be believed. Chalk joints that needed to be passed became easier to pass.
Cons
  • There is no possibility of managing it. There is no roll to speak of. A rumble can be heard after traveling 100 km/m. The sidewall is pliable and somewhat thin.

Revainrating 5 out of 5

A really necessary purchase, glad I found this product.

Because I didn't need much evil, I went with tires that could handle a variety of terrains. 90% of them are in the city. The way the car drives has become slightly different; when making fast corners, there is now a sensation of a tiny oversteer. Aside from that, I thought the tires were great, particularly the level of comfort in comparison to my prior set.

Pros
  • It is gentle, quiet, and handles itself nicely on wet roadways.
Cons
  • We haven't identified any problems as of yet.

Revainrating 5 out of 5

I really like the product, it fully meets my expectations.

Excellent tires! In May of 2022, I purchased a Continental Cross Contact LX2 automobile. I had a terrific experience with the tires since they are perfect for taking long drives in an SUV around the city, they are peaceful, and they confidently keep the car on a wet track. In a word: I give my recommendation!

Pros
  • Tires are silent, not loud at all
Cons
  • Soft rubber, weak sidewall

Revainrating 5 out of 5

Valuable purchase, nothing but pluses!

The tire that was used was chosen from a group of tires that were aesthetically comparable based on the tread pattern. The guardian was the one who offered the most support. The acquisition has resulted in complete contentment. The tires are quiet, and they operate well on wet roads; also, the vehicle is stable when driven at high speeds.

Pros
  • The noise produced by the tire is very manageable. Excellent grip properties.
Cons
  • The tread can become clogged with debris of a smaller size.

. In general, I couldn't be happier with the rubber's performance. It turned out to be really quiet, and the roll was such that you needed to slow down, contrary to my expectations, which were that it would generate noise and that the amount of consumption would grow. It maintains the road's ideal condition on the dry pavement. However, it is not suitable for heavy off-roading.

Pros
  • It is not noisy, and its road holding is superb; it also does well on damp tracks. Comfortable, soft rubber.
Cons
  • did not bring to light any deficiencies

Revainrating 5 out of 5

Excellent product, the best quality.

Instead of using ordinary bridges, I used the Rav 4 for it. Almost immediately, a difference could be perceived. Good grip on wet and dry pavement. Maneuvers that can be performed with complete assurance regardless of the wind speed or the weather. On the gravel, they had good performance. Tires that are both quiet and comfy. I would recommend these tires to anyone searching for a versatile option for their small crossover vehicle.

Pros
  • The tire has a pleasant ride and works admirably on both dry and wet asphalt. Not noisy.
Cons
  • I didn't even notice it.

Revainrating 5 out of 5

I'm amazed! It was definitely worth the money!

Excellent tires! For the city and for bad roads - it's the most. For the "German autobahns", of course the H/T bridge would be better. Pros below: Low noise, very soft and comfortable, all good with aquaplaning. You go - you rest! Has some cons: At speeds over 160 km / h a little uncomfortable. The track is also not her element.

Revainrating 5 out of 5

The right product for me, there were no problems.

You really should give it a shot! It worked out quite well for use, both on the track and on rough terrain. The soft sidewall is a little bit bothersome, and it seems as though you will need to monitor the tire pressure more frequently, but this is obviously done for the purpose of making the ride more comfortable. Only positives up to this point!

Pros
  • A tire with a very pleasant ride. It performed admirably on both dry and wet surfaces. Neither one seemed to affect it. Very quiet. It does a good job of removing water from the contact patch.
Cons
  • No defects found.

Revainrating 5 out of 5

I am delighted, the product is really worthy.

The impression after the old tires is simply excellent, I took it taking into account the fact that I would go to the dirt road, go to the forest. The tire lived up to all expectations, smooth ride, good road holding, impressive.

Pros
  • Quiet, soft, really liked the grip properties on the pavement and on the primer.
Cons
  • Didn't notice

Revainrating 3 out of 5

I thought it would be better, but overall not bad.

The passion for this rubber is not something I share. There is no need to discuss the move's weakness. Additionally, dry braking is quite subpar. 225/65/17. from Portugal. Vehicle: Suzuki Grand Vitara. Since I've been driving a Vitara for 8 years, I can immediately compare the feelings. Perhaps the HZ tires' behavior will change over the summer's heat. Substitute unsubscribe.

Pros
  • Nothing much, really.
Cons
  • Distance to stop on a dry surface. Rigidity.

Fantastic tire. Size 225/65 R17 was the tire size that was purchased for the Suzuki Grand Vitara. Due to the adaptability of the tread pattern, I anticipated that the tire would produce more noise than any other road option; nonetheless, I was pleasantly surprised to find that it was absolutely inaudible. Additionally, the tread pattern immediately makes it evident that not only can they be used in asphalt conditions, but also that they may walk out into nature and not be concerned about…

Pros
  • Low noise levels, superb handling, and complete faith in the tires
Cons
  • Until I discovered

Revainrating 4 out of 5

Well done, but I wont buy any more.

evaluations of acoustic comfort seduced me. Although I would prefer Michelin, the costs for my size 235/65 R17 are outrageous. Yes, Michelin's quality is deteriorating as well; with insufficient use, they started to fall apart and hummed. There have been 2 weeks. He covered 3000 kilometers in this time, including a trip to the Crimea and back. I had a strong resonant noise both there and on my first day back, especially when accelerating. At 120, it finally stopped. The noise started to quiet…

Pros
  • 1. Softly, with a thud, swallows bumps. 2. Deep puddles sneak through while the new ones are OK. 3. Directional stability and decent handling for everyone.
Cons
  • 1. NOISE. The hum actually starts at 40 and increases to 80. At speeds up to 140 mph on the earlier Michelin Latitude Tour Ash Pi, noise was essentially nonexistent, while a hum could be heard on worn tires. 2. Once more, acceleration and deceleration characteristics are substantially worse than with Michelin. If the car fired at Michelin and came to a complete stop, it became more reflective at Conti. 3. The workmanship is subpar; 90g were hung on one side of the tire fitting for balancing. It was even less earlier, Kama, as I recall. Perhaps due to "Made in Portugal"?

Revainrating 5 out of 5

I'm impressed! Exactly the product deserves your attention.

In 2022, life will be rubbery. Although some control precision is sacrificed, the improvement to our roadways is practically miraculous. A great tire for long-distance driving in a large crossover. I installed them on my Grand Vitara, when before they had been bridgestone, the difference between heaven and earth, a ferociously hard rubber, giving the car the sense of a sports car with excellent handling designed for the track rather than a vehicle designed for use on earth. I think it's a great

Pros
  • Comfort
Cons
  • Precision regulation

Revainrating 5 out of 5

A great option for this money, I definitely recommend it!

replaced the stock bridges on the Suzuki Grand Vitara with tires measuring 225/65/17. Wishlist originally intended to take something gentler. I looked at European brands because, according to reports, "the Japanese are not the same anymore." I finally decided on these continental and Michelin Latitude Cross versions. 10% gravel/sand and 90% asphalt comprise my mileage. I chose Kontik since the Michelin tread felt too off-road to me. Despite sitting down in both the sand and the mud rut on this…

Pros
  • 1. Soft. 2. Quiet 3. Superb braking on both dry and slick surfaces 3. I hope there will be enough resources (1,000 kilometers). Even though the tires have just traveled 20 000 km (since August 2022), there are still no obvious symptoms of substantial wear.
Cons
  • The protector has the drawback of getting a lot of little stones lodged in it.

Revainrating 5 out of 5

The quality exceeds all expectations, I recommend to buy.

Very lengthy picked out this design. Read a ton of tests and reviews. The specifications called for the tire to be capable of handling high speeds of at least 160 km/h. and for off-roading excursions. further for the carriage of loads up to three tons. This means that the tread of the tire must be made of a material other than asphalt. Before that, I visited numerous examples of renowned businesses. They all had good points and bad points. However, after purchasing these tires, I understood…

Pros
  • Amazing model! acceptable volume of noise. Excellent off-road tire handling. stable course management. It travels as though on rails. fantastic traction in the rain. Outstanding dry grip. extremely well in light off-road terrain. Strangely enough, it operates flawlessly on dry pavement even when it's freezing outside.
Cons
  • practically none!

2022 kit tire size 215/60 R16 is mounted on a Tiguan. Rubber is silent. It's not that she didn't create any noises; rather, it's that she doesn't have her own "voice," which means that, when compared to the surrounding noise, her sound does not stand out in any manner and, as a result, cannot be heard. Only when the surface changes (the old asphalt stops and a new one begins, for example) - then some component of the general noise changes its tone, and you recall that, in fact, the wheels of…

Pros
  • gentle, quiet, and tenacious.
Cons
  • Nothing was wrong

Revainrating 5 out of 5

I am very happy with this purchase, I will advise everyone!

Renault Arkana is equipped with 215/60R17 tires. In general, I'll give it a score of 4.5 out of 5. I took the wheels so I could occasionally drive into the forest and to the village. I gave it a try on a muddy primer, and for a crossover, it rows rather nicely. The road holds really well. Fantastic in the rain. At 60 km/h, hit the curb. Eight were on the disk. Despite the fact that the rubber was tight and even the "hernia" did not pop out, I initially believed that the wheel had been ejected…

Pros
  • Rowing in murky water is not too bad. On the ruts, everything seems to be normal. It rides normally in the rain, and no hydroplaning at reasonable speeds was seen.
Cons
  • Although it can be fairly noisy on particular types of asphalt, overall, the acoustic comfort is typical. On the "Minchelin mud and snow," it may appear like the car is pushing in one direction at times.