Header banner
Revain logoHome Page

Reviews

Global ratings 181
  • 5
    122
  • 4
    38
  • 3
    11
  • 2
    6
  • 1
    4

Type of review

Revainrating 5 out of 5

The best thing for the money, Im glad I chose this option.

I put it on a Toyota Corolla car in the amount of 195 \ 65 r15. Prior to that, went to Nokian, Nordman, Amtel, Cordiant, Toyota, Pirelli. Compared to the tires mentioned above, Kontiki is one of the softest in terms of acoustic comfort and softness, they simply don’t notice small joints, but as a result, the driving style has changed to a calmer one, because with our roads . Braking is also excellent, even if it rains. dry asphalt. I punctured a tire under warranty, they fixed it for free, a…

Pros
  • comfort, excellent braking on any surface, extended Continental warranty
Cons
  • except for the price

Revainrating 4 out of 5

Satisfactory product quality, good price.

From the factory it stands on Renault Sandero steppes 2 - 205/55/16. The impression is twofold. Not noisy and well holding dry asphalt up to 130 km / h and wet up to 110 km / h, wear is minimal for 30,000 runs. But as soon as you pull off the road, the horror begins. The tire is not something that slips - it licks. On wet grass you can’t touch the slightest rise, on clay it is immediately oiled and not back, not forward. I got under the first snow last year - it was hell. In the snow, even on a

Pros
  • - practically no noise - virtually indestructible - asphalt holds well
Cons
  • - glides everywhere except asphalt

Revainrating 4 out of 5

Satisfied with the product, I recommend it to everyone.

With its pros: It holds the road well, there is no noticeable aquaplaning, it brakes confidently both on dry and wet pavement. With its cons: It behaves very badly on wet ground / grass / clay, if there is no tractor nearby in the field on it after or during rain, it is better not to meddle.

Revainrating 5 out of 5

Good quality product, I rate this purchase excellent.

Continental tires were installed on the Opel Astra after the no less famous Michelin brand. The main selection criterion was tires that will not disappoint after the tires that were used before, almost the same price category, but it seemed to me that the declared performance indicators were better, namely handling and acoustic comfort. So far it is difficult to talk about the wear resistance of the tire, but in principle the tire has almost fully met all expectations. I was a little…

Pros
  • Comfort, handling both on dry and wet surfaces at high speeds, noiselessness.
Cons
  • Not found.

This is a really great tire! I don't usually write reviews, but this is different. on Wednesday, 08/15/18 in the evening at the entrance to Hong Kong, along the Simferopol highway, I got into a thunderstorm. I flew into it at a speed of 140 km / h (Mers ML, four-wheel drive) I got into a rut with water (cm5 no less), and hit it so smartly that I almost swam. Turned out perfect! about braking, I can also say only good impressions. easily left at 70 km / h In general, there were many cases when…

Pros
  • excellent grip on the road
Cons
  • ))) due to traction increased gasoline consumption

Revainrating 5 out of 5

I am delighted, the product is really worthy.

Ford Focus 3, 215/55/R16. Bought to replace a deceased Michelin. I felt the difference right away, the tires are an order of magnitude softer and quieter, at 60-80 km / h on asphalt with almost no characteristic rustle. The first 500 kilometers I was cautious - without sharp starts, braking, new tires, it's a pity. After a while I scored - I tried once from a traffic light to the floor. Pleasantly surprised! Not a hint of slippage! They didn’t even squeak - the hook is brutal! In general, I…

Pros
  • Quiet, soft, excellent grip and drag on dry and wet roads
Cons
  • Have not found

Revainrating 5 out of 5

The best price for such a product, I will buy more!

The second set on the third car. More than happy, Regardless of the size range, always only 5. Consumption is higher than I want, but I am ready to pay for rubber consumption knowing that no matter the conditions, I will not break the car. At a temperature of -5, +5, I heat up the wheels for 10 minutes on the way, then control as in the summer. Its pros: Holds the road well on asphalt and light ground, excellent grip in the rain. Its cons: not a lot of increased wear, which is expected from a…

Revainrating 5 out of 5

I was surprised by the quality for this price.

after experimenting, I switched back to fully standard rubber sizes and chose this one. car Ford Fiesta 1.6 2022 tire size 175/65/r14. balanced normally: 3 wheels-25 grams, 1 wheel 35 grams. very pleased with the steering and especially the fact that the rubber is insensitive to rutting. the production of the 2022 is alarming, okay, we will support the domestic manufacturer. used to go to hankuk evo v12

Pros
  • handling, road holding is excellent, insensitive to rutting, tire fitters said that the rubber is soft
Cons
  • made in 2022, noisy above average

Revainrating 4 out of 5

As such, there are no disadvantages, it is convenient to use.

At first they liked it very much, they kept the road well, they braked just fine. They quickly wore off, I have been using it for the second year, and I think that I need to change it! The new ones do not drain water well, the worn ones don’t drain at all - in a wet climate (like Peter) they are not safe. Two damage to the sidewall from the pits - the wheels deflated, expensive restoration, vulcanization. Changing tires every two years is too much for me, I will not buy these again.

Pros
  • Excellent handling in the first year Quiet
Cons
  • Rubber wears out in a year Weak sidewall (easy to damage) Water is poorly drained.

Revainrating 5 out of 5

Im amazed! It was definitely worth the money!

Despite the shortcomings, having skated three seasons on one set and propping the sidewall of one of the wheels on the curb, as well as having numerous punctures and cuts in the last season, I took exactly the same rubber again as a replacement. I did this for the first time in 22 years of driving experience, as the rubber is very, very much liked for its unsurpassed tenacity in corners and excellent behavior in the rain. Yes, and I am writing a review about rubber for the first time, as I am…

Pros
  • Excellent road holding, incl. and in the rain, it is difficult to break the skid in a turn - very tenacious. Soft, comfortable, relatively not noisy.
Cons
  • A very soft and vulnerable sidewall - it is pressed through with a finger (a fee for the softness of the move), it easily breaks on the curbs, it is absolutely impossible to rub against them. It is very sensitive to the track (amendment - the new one is not at all sensitive, but by the end of the third season it is no longer possible to drive on the track). Insufficiently responsive to steering, blunts (again, due to soft sidewalls). Hard to steer when parking.

Revainrating 5 out of 5

The quality exceeds all expectations, I recommend to buy.

Soft, the car seemed to have changed the suspension according to the sensations, the bumps on the road almost became barely noticeable. The suspension of the car wears out less, bumps are extinguished by tires. Confidently drive at the maximum speed of the car. It handles well and brakes great (but it also depends on the car). Confident overtaking. For two seasons, the sidewalls of two tires were torn, unsuccessfully fell into deep pits - the price of softness. It is by no means torn in every…

Pros
  • Soft
Cons
  • Weaker sidewalls - but this is due to softness

Revainrating 4 out of 5

Everything is fine, there are only minor drawbacks.

Really soft and quietly work out bumps, but I don’t advise anyone who cares about acceleration dynamics. For me, softness is still the main criterion, and I consciously went for all these minuses. Pros below: - Soft, well and quietly fulfills irregularities. On my rigid-suspension Rio, it's just a thrill. Really ceased to rumble on bumps, the car is far from new. - While new - water cuts just perfect. - On the road, the car sits like a glove, firmly holds its course, does not throw out of the…

Revainrating 5 out of 5

I am amazed at how well the product is made, just magically!

I bought tires from a dealer on Rustaveli 42, the store itself, the service in the store and on the shm, everything was very good and I liked it. I'm talking about tires . Before that, it was Michelin, but it quickly wore out and pierced several wheels. The guys from the store convinced me to put Continental Premium 5, I’m 100% satisfied, I didn’t find any minuses, it’s quiet, it keeps the road at 130 km / h very well, in the rain it’s just great . And also, it turns out, there is a…

Pros
  • Quiet, good road holding in the rain, very manageable.
Cons
  • Have not found.

Revainrating 5 out of 5

Wonderful quality, one hundred percent satisfied!

The choice fell on this rubber, because of its availability in rubber (the tautology came out) and not bad indicators in terms of tests and reviews. Before it stood Dunlop SP Sport 01 from the factory. Of course, when I left the tire shop, I immediately noticed the almost absence of hum and vibrations (dunlop tires are very hard and noisy), driving next to the concrete bump stop, the sound of the wind overshadowed the rustle of rubber. Due to the soft sides, the joints of the roadway and…

Pros
  • Quiet, comfortable, confident braking, insensitive to the rut, sharp "0", performs well on wet roads.
Cons
  • Very soft sides, a little lubricates the reaction to turn the steering wheel.

Departure on the previous generation (France) 9 years - about 20 thousand km. Rubber is just great. On a wet track, it’s not scary to go into turns, it brakes perfectly, there is no noise. Not one hernia or anything, although the disks periodically corrected. Did not change, because everything was normal, but after 9 years it started to look like slicks and cracks appeared in places

Pros
  • I took for a good price, fresh year all 4 tires, Czech Republic
Cons
  • Conti just doesn't have them for this price.

Revainrating 5 out of 5

I'm amazed! It was definitely worth the money!

After KAMA, sava and Kumho, the feeling has changed. Enough comfort to move around in an old toyote corolle. It will be interesting to check how many seasons such soft rubber will last.

Revainrating 3 out of 5

Mediocre goods, most likely I will not use.

Kalina's car, wheel size 195/50 R15, ride is generally calm, 60% out of town, 30% city and 10% motorway. When I bought it, I hoped that it would last for 5 years, but alas. Season 3 and already up to the 1 mm indicator, upset. At first, there was nothing to complain about, but after the holidays, I realized that the wear and tear for the trip is great, although about once a year I do a collapse on the car. due to wear and tear I will choose another manufacturer of wheels.

Pros
  • 1. Control reliability 2. Good grip on asphalt both dry and wet. 3. Quiet (as long as the mileage is less than 10,000 km) 4. There is a one-year manufacturer's warranty. 5. Excellent rolling on these wheels (low fuel consumption)
Cons
  • 1. They wear out very quickly, enough for 3 seasons, and about 30,000 km for a trip to the south, I ate about 1.5 mm of tread at the back of 1 mm on the front wheels 2. The less tread left, the more they make noise.

Revainrating 5 out of 5

Best price for this product, will buy more!

I spent a few days on the Internet in search of information about tires. It is necessary to replace worn-out bridgestone turanza 205/55R16, AUDI A4 cars. I read a lot of different reviews and comments. In the end, I realized that what is good for one person may be bad for another. One thing is clear - the most important thing in rubber is reliability, so that they slow down on any surface. Also, in order for the model to be up-to-date, all of a sudden something happened to one wheel, you could…

Pros
  • Comfortable, soft, quiet tire. Value for money 5 points.
Cons
  • did not find

Revainrating 4 out of 5

I like everything, the price and quality are acceptable.

I bought in '12 $ 90 per wheel. 195/65/15, made in Portugal. Very good brakes and dry and wet. At 120, I flew into a puddle on the right side, I practically don’t feel it, especially after the winter amtel. The sides are very soft, I did not notice an increase in comfort (Alfa romeo 164). With a disc width of 7.5J, roll appeared in turns. Holds well on 5.5j, much better than Barum bravuris 2 (don't take NEVER). Wear is normal I think. For approximately 25 thousand km. from 7.5 mm to 5.5 mm. I…

Pros
  • good braking
Cons
  • no, they were expensive

Revainrating 4 out of 5

Exactly what I needed, it's a great buy, I recommend it.

I'll probably take the ECo option, the aphid option, I'll try the Michelin. It seems to me that the tires are plus or minus lonely. I have a Viking 6 winter sticker, I can say the following, I won’t buy more. Before that, there was Amtel on spikes, so, it was really better for its characteristics and price, but there was a minus noisy. For our snowy 2022, it is better to take spikes, but if you are not going to go to Europe. All non-studded tires are for Europe only. In 2022, it does not slow…

Pros
  • In the name and dressed in what else
Cons
  • Weak sidewall