Pros
- Holds the road on any surface
Cons
- Didn't find any deficiencies
Pros
- After rolling, spikes are enough for 3-4 winters, even if there is almost no winter They behave very well on porridge and loose snow, you can tear it down, but you need to try to do it They are also good on ice, both on a rural road and on city ice. On asphalt ruts, they roll like the rest of my winter tires (michelin xin2, goodyear ug400, gislaved nf5) I don’t even want to mention the rolled snow, it’s just like driving on asphalt QUIET, well, really quiet even new, much quieter than previous winter tires Strong - I caught holes, but not a single bump . On different surfaces (for example, asphalt on the left side, snow or mud on the right side), the car does not shake, it drives smoothly and you don’t have to hold it or push it to one of the sides A large rut is felt and you have to hold the car so that it does not scour, but when overtaking at speeds of 80+, the car does not throw, but slightly shakes (the car had already been caught on the previous tires)
Cons
- Price. Since the purchase of the last set, the price has risen by 1000 per bottle
Pros
- Reliability and quality often make you forget about the season.
Cons
- At speeds above 140 km/h, a snow cloud forms, which makes it difficult for other motorists to move.) It does not encourage careful driving.
Pros
- Holds ice and dry pavement well, brakes well, rows deep snow perfectly
Cons
- Sometimes a bit unsteady on tight turns on an unpaved road with loose snow
Pros
- Compared to the linden Bridgestone Revo GZ seemed to me more predictable. It's become more fun to drive. In general, there were no particular complaints about the rubber, despite the very soft sidewall: they were scared that hernias on it were a frequent occurrence. I didn't catch one. The roads in our city are not ideal, I flew into the pits - mother do not worry. As for noise, I would say: - as long as there are spikes: speed up to 60 km / h - they are like summer ones, maybe even quieter. Above - buzzing. - there are no spikes: they are quieter than summer ones :) I have summer Bridgestone H/P. They make noise :) The tread is aggressive, despite the softness, after five winters it was still very decent.
Cons
- On the spikes: in the third year of operation, they began to break. They broke, but didn't fall out. That is, there is a piece of iron in the hole, but there is no spike. For the fourth season, there were very few spikes, and for the fifth, there were none left at all. Some iron stumps. Ride became hard, especially uphill on the ice, sold for a penny. But my car is so tricky.
Pros
- Wear resistance, cost, behavior on ice and in deep snow
Cons
- Noisy, poor handling on pavement
Pros
- The price, the tires are really good, the first snowfall is the Hong Kong-region route, the car is very confident that it kept the road, snow, porridge, ice, no problems. Very happy with the tires.
Cons
- I didn’t find it, because they immediately warned the noise would pass after the break-in, I had already driven 900 km, there was no noise. as far as possible on studded tires.
Pros
- Spikes, on winter trips out of town justify themselves. I hope these will be as good as the Pirellis. The price is adequate, otherwise Hakku is generally space!
Cons
- On slightly wet pavement nn-neee slows down! Today I almost painted one horseman on the 5-ke. It should be noted here that I myself significantly exceeded the speed for such weather, and also was not careful and prudent. As a result, I miraculously parked on the side of the road and henceforth I will drive much more carefully.
Pros
- Snow, ice, wet asphalt while there are spikes
Cons
- SHIP, noise.
Pros
- Reliability, confidence in the tire, cross-country ability.
Cons
- Noise is the only negative.
Pros
- 1. Snow traction is excellent, the "evil" tread pattern affects 2. Driving into snow slush at speed goes unnoticed 3. Braking forces you to look in your rearview mirror and make sure no one is flying any matadors or cordiants into your stern. 4. Over the time since installation (October 2022) and mileage (~ 6000 km, mostly on brushed asphalt), not a single spike has flown out 5. Reasonable price, a set of 4 wheels 205/55 R16 cost 19 thousand 6. Economical, fuel consumption has not increased much
Cons
- Arise from the characteristics of rubber: 1. Increased noise on well-salted or cleaned tracks 2. There is vibration, due to the same "evil" tread
Pros
- value for money/quality
Cons
- harsh buzzing
Pros
- price tag, quality
Pros
- Cross-country ability, stability, braking qualities, predictability of reaction
Cons
- Valkost, some slowness of reaction
Pros
- While driving on wet asphalt and in the evenings already frozen asphalt. Behaves predictably. I have not experienced hydroplaning as such, although there are enough puddles in Hong Kong.
Cons
- Until I noticed. Winter will show.
Pros
- strong, reliable, confidently cling to the road
Cons
- very loud, the first 500 kilometers
