Header banner
Revain logoHome Page

Reviews

Global ratings 315
  • 5
    174
  • 4
    67
  • 3
    33
  • 2
    21
  • 1
    20

Type of review

Thanks to the pattern and tread depth, it was easy to move on the roads after a blizzard (when it has not yet been cleaned, and snow up to the bumper and above). Unlike many other road users who simply skidded in place. I even wondered why my car was running on front-wheel drive, but the same Skoda Yeti was not. There was another case, in the spring it threw me at the moment the snow melted in the field, the road was impassable, in general I got up and not there, not here, go ahead pits from…

Pros
  • 1. Almost perfect tread pattern for snow/mud/ice, rows perfectly, and rows exactly). 2. It holds the road well in slush, snow / water, it was tested on the highway at a speed of 150, it didn’t fly off the road even in medium-steep turns, I didn’t notice any hint of a breakdown. 3. Soft rubber compared to competitors. 4. There are more spikes than in the same Hakka 7. 5. Produced in Poland and Germany (thank God not in 2022).
Cons
  • A bit noisy on dry pavement.

Revainrating 5 out of 5

A good quality product, I rate this purchase perfectly.

I myself often rely on reviews on the market when choosing something, so I will write it as it is, without embellishment. Experience of use: 3 seasons 205/55 R16 and 1 season 215/65 R16 (sold the car). For 3 seasons of operation, 1 spike from four cylinders was lost, although the spikes are glued and many are afraid of this. Depreciation 20-30% (20-22 t. Km. ) Made in Germany. Trapezoidal spike, first gnaws ice, then gnaws asphalt, in the literal sense. By manageability: The chip of this…

Pros
  • 1. Acceleration and braking is beyond praise on any surface (including wet pavement, which is not particularly fond of spikes) 2. Confident handling when maneuvering and cornering 3. Wear resistance 4. The spikes sit tightly in the rubber
Cons
  • Completely missing!

I bought this rubber on Sh. Kruz, in 2022. I skated on it for 3 seasons about 50,000 km (city-highway) in Hong Kong and the region, mainly on asphalt (60-70%). The spikes were not significantly reduced, for the 4th season it would have been enough for sure (but the spikes themselves were almost not erased). Rubber proved to be excellent in heavy snowfalls and not brushed roads! I drove out on the front-wheel drive and automatic transmission sometimes from places where others wielded a shovel to

Pros
  • Everything but the flaws
Cons
  • swims a little on the track, but predictably

the first trip and I was shocked) they put me in a helicopter, I'm already used to it. So far, like it despite the noise of the hum) Well, I drove 10,000 all the super spikes in place, the hum and noise disappeared. Those who love confidence on the road in winter, I advise you in any weather! IF WITH WITNESS! ) The second season, the spikes in place, the wear is not great, I was very pleased. But if the temperature is from -4 to +, it makes noise, it feels like all the bearings are buzzing))))…

Pros
  • price, performance, confidence on the road! Ice, snow, porridge, everything is not how much!
Cons
  • feels the track, 195/65/15

Revainrating 5 out of 5

The quality is top notch, be sure to try it.

Strongly recommended for anyone and everyone! To get the most value out of "these" dollars, in my opinion, choose this choice! Has pros: Very dependable ride! I'm delighted I went with this particular model. It's comparable to Gislaved 3 and Nordman 5, in my opinion. I simply did not visit any of the others. The Goodyear Ultra Grip Ice Arctic has a hard 5 rating, whereas the Gislaved 3 has a hard 4 rating, and the Nordman 5 has a quadruple rating. On December 30, 2022, there were over 30…

Revainrating 5 out of 5

A wonderful product, it's nice to use.

The vehicle rolls smoothly and drives really well. Snow and dirt make for fantastic rows! On asphalt, it has excellent stopping power. The spikes are packed in quite closely. Only three of the spikes on one of the wheels came loose during the course of two seasons of operation; the remainder of the spikes are securely fastened.

Revainrating 4 out of 5

Not a bad buy, well worth the money.

The previous car had such rubber. I liked it. The flotation is very good. It skids a little on the corners, but you can get used to it. small towns where there is a lot of snow. Torn tires delivered to the store for replacement under warranty. Photographed, sent to the Goodyear representative office. 60 days have passed - no answer. Under the contract, they can consider up to 90 days. I don’t understand why wait 90 days. The store said that there was little chance that they would replace it.…

Pros
  • Good grip on packed snow. Quiet.
Cons
  • It skids a little on corners. I think the sidewall is weak. I broke the rubber. Maybe it’s not the rubber. You can tear any rubber.

Hyndai i30. Some write spikes fall out. For 3 seasons I have 5 thousand per season, I have not lost a single one (pensioner's driving). Well, I don’t buy spikes to trot. They write that it makes cornering, I did not notice this! Rides straight! Doesn't feel the wheel! Puddles are also fluffy smoke! The rubber is good, if it didn’t break into slipping on rolled snow, I would put 5 +++!

Pros
  • Rides in deep snow with no problems! Any basin becomes an all-terrain vehicle!
Cons
  • Breaks into a ski on rolled snow, after about 3 seconds. after emergency braking. Here you have to be careful, once, I almost stuck in a jeep (speed 35 km / h)

Revainrating 3 out of 5

Not everything is so bad, but there are disadvantages.

Got pros: Rows well, stable in the city and on the tracks. In a skid behaves predictably. Brakes confidently. On ice, of course, not very much, but it's ice, right? Its cons: She departed for two seasons (76/44/77 regions). Thorns fell in the second season. I had to go three times to balance. On the road they hum like KAMAZ (someone will like it)

Revainrating 5 out of 5

The right product for me, there were no problems.

I want to warn you! Roll very carefully for about 2022 km. Lost several spikes at once at the beginning of operation due to sudden braking. Then they sit as if rooted to the spot. Lost 8 spikes from 4 wheels during the season. As I put on my shoes, the consumption increased by 1 liter. Due to the large spikes, the roll is lost. After a run of 5000 km, the consumption decreased by 0.5 liters. Road holding is excellent. In the very ice with "porridge" proved to be 5+ freely drove along the…

Pros
  • R15/195/65 Holds excellent in ice. The spikes are strong and hold up great. but there is a nuance to rolling. Balances fine. I recommend.
Cons
  • Noise is good, but tolerable.

I also remembered the moment about the strength of this particular model. As soon as I bought and installed it, literally after 1.5 months on the side of the rubber I cut off a piece of rubber somewhere in deep snow to a cord about a penny coin, poured rubber glue there so that water would not get in and with such a thing I roll on this rubber until now. No hernia, no gaps. I have the size: 215/60 f16"

Pros
  • Excellent tires. Excellent rowing on any snow (thanks to the deep Christmas tree tread) and ice. Excellent brakes, and this is the main factor of choice for me, because. the main thing is not to disperse your projectile faster than anyone else, but the main thing is to stop it. For my experience since 1998, I have ridden on many brands of rubber and on different cars, starting with the VAZ-21099 and the GY UltraGrip400, and so it was GY that I liked the most, both in price and in cross-country ability, predictability, durability and controllability. Haka is also a good rubber, BUT: the price and its weakness are depressing. Haka with a good blow goes with a screw and you can’t do anything else with it. This rubber went on my VW Sharan 2 weighing 1.8 tons for three seasons, but more than 60 thousand km, during this distance, of course, it lost some of the spikes - this is natural wear. Many write, they say, weak, not passable, etc. - guys, let's not argue with the laws of physics, and experience with adequacy does not interfere with gaining. Everyone, good luck on the road.
Cons
  • A little noise, but this criterion can be set for any studded rubber. Some more, some a little less, but still they buzz more than not studded.

Revainrating 5 out of 5

A great option for this money, I definitely recommend it!

Size 215/60/16. Cars Opel Zafira Tourer. Rubber is soft and quiet. I hear the diesel work more than the spikes, but after 110 there is a slight hum. Walks on ice like it's on rails. There is not the slightest hint of slipping, in any situation. Snow, in general, is her element. After a snowfall on Celene, on the front-wheel drive, as if on a Subaru, it travels at a speed of 80 km, and the steering wheel and pedals are excellent. Yes, and in deep snow it is confidently tight. In the garage along

Pros
  • Ice handling, snow handling, relatively quiet in my size.
Cons
  • Poorly kept straight on the pavement, handling in corners on the pavement (muzzle floats out).

Revainrating 5 out of 5

Matches the description completely, very satisfied.

I have a Toyota Surf car, it is such a Japanese strong SUV that can drive on any road. I've been driving it for over 5 years and still couldn't find a good tire for it. It slips on ice, then the spikes fall off in the second month, then it doesn’t slow down on wet asphalt, etc. And then for the first time last year I took Ice Arctic SUV, on the advice of a friend. I am completely satisfied with the quality of the tires, they ride in the snow perfectly, I do not skid. The car brakes well…

Pros
  • short braking distance, good cross-country ability under different weather conditions
Cons
  • price, thought to buy cheaper

Revainrating 4 out of 5

Not a bad purchase, worth the money.

Pereobul wife's car Hyundai Getz in them. My wife travels recently, so I decided not to save money. After installing new tires on new wheels, carrying out educational work on running in, etc. drove home in good spirits. I was a little surprised by the noise, quite loud, despite the fact that the speed did not exceed 50 km / h. There is nothing to compare with. I had Camry and Nokia H4 - there was no noise. But in the Camry and the insulation is an order of magnitude higher). In the morning a…

Pros
  • The tread and structure of the stud promise good performance on ice and snow. Price.
Cons
  • Noise. There is nothing to compare with.

Revainrating 5 out of 5

Wonderful quality, one hundred percent satisfied!

Superb rubber! A hack 7 came before that! It's time for new tires, and I found this brand online and immediately fell in love with the design. I checked out the feedback! And I made the choice to buy! simple break time rowing and riding. The studs' unique design provides exceptional traction on the ice. Despite my reservations, I went ahead and sold the vehicle equipped with this tire. Since I got a new car just in time for winter, I had to restock on Goodyear Ultra Grip Ice Arctic tires. Most…

Pros
  • Very good tires in terms of road noise reduction. Pulls a snow trailer like a pro! Quiet! Sturdy, stud-like tread
Cons
  • Absolutely none of them exist!

Revainrating 5 out of 5

A wonderful product, it's nice to use.

The tread pattern looks great - bold, aggressive! Renault Duster 4x4 2.0 car In the spring I drive to the dacha off-road in the same place where the UAZ vehicles drove. I do not poke my head only where I see that there is a danger of sitting on the bottom. After three winters, about 50% of the spikes flew out (it's my own fault - I drive aggressively). I pulled out the rest with pliers and now I drive like summer ones, until next winter. Bought a new set of tires for next winter.

Pros
  • Everything is fine! Proezdil on it three winters. I drive aggressively. Both in the city and intercity. Excellent moves even on ice and porridge. Stops like a tank. Stability at high speed! Once, on a new but already run-in rubber, I was driving at a speed of 140-160 km / h along an icy track - like on rails!
Cons
  • A little noisier than you'd like. Thin sidewall - in the third season, he broke through, flying into a stone.

Revainrating 5 out of 5

I didn³'t expect the quality to be this good.

I tried to take what they do "from us" and, according to the "sellers", pushing in rubber from competing factories and claiming that now everything is done "with us and you won't find imported ones." As it turned out, this is all a scam - do not be fooled. Everyone who moved production to the 2022 got screwed up, to see a "cursed place", and I consider it a great success that I managed to take this rubber. For the sake of objectivity, it should be mentioned that there are also Korea and Japan…

Pros
  • Production - Poland. Unlike the "high-profile Conti-Nokian brands" produced in our "vast territory", this rubber is made for people, with high quality, in compliance with all standards, which is felt immediately after changing the shoes of the car. The price is the same as that of the famous competitors made here, but everything else is much better. Skated on - autumn asphalt of the city / highway - snow porridge - on snow/ice in the cold weather of this (2022/2022) season. Impressions are only positive: - all spikes in place - car behaves predictably - the spikes don't make much noise - rubber does not tan - on the track - in +2 / -2 keeps track
Cons
  • None of the sellers speaks on the phone the country of production - you have to go and see for yourself "Made in" There is a feeling that on a film of snow on top of the asphalt, the car asks for demolition a little more than usual, but with a reasonable choice of speed, there are no problems.

Revainrating 2 out of 5

Only disadvantages and no pluses, do not buy.

I bought tires after reading reviews, which, as it seems to me now, for the most part, are "custom-made". I drive little and slowly, and in two seasons I skated only 2 thousand km on these tires - and have already lost more than half of the spikes. Due to the fact that the grooves are actually across the tires, there is no directional stability of the car. Once I was driving at a speed of 40 km / h, the road was covered with snow slurry 2 cm thick - as a result, the car was simply thrown off…

Pros
  • No.
Cons
  • Tires have a design flaw: the tread grooves across the tire due to this lack of directional stability. Lost 60% of studs in two seasons.

Revainrating 5 out of 5

The perfect product for any user!

Chose between: Michelin X-Ice North XIN2, Continental ContiIceContact and Nokian Hakkapeliitta. The first one disappeared due to the fact that the old model was already satisfied, the other two were not pleased with the price. Goodyear Ultragrip Ice Arctic interested in the price and novelty of the model. Due to the small number of tests and reviews, I had to take a risk, which I did not regret.

Pros
  • On ice, porridge, snow and water goes to 5+ Traction and handling patency Price quality The number of spikes and their location Not high noise level Porridge and puddles just do not notice Technologies
Cons
  • On dry and wet asphalt behaves a little worse than on winter surfaces (But not critical)