📷 Nikon AF-S NIKKOR 35mm f/1.8G ED Lens: Perfect Auto Focus Zoom for Nikon DSLR Cameras Review

Excellent staffer, bokeh - for an amateur, at infinity - porridge, but this, as I understand it, I chose between 35 1.8 and sigma 30 1.4, Sigma will certainly be better, but the toad won :)

Sharing my authentic review.I took it as the first lens, instead of a whale, I did not regret it, there is something to compare with!

Providing honest impressions.Bought half a year ago and he still pleases, very comfortable! I recommend it as a universal fix for all occasions.

It is practically the size of a soap dish when combined with the D3100, and examples of images taken with both can be found at Got pros: Sharp even at f/1.8, a focal length that is useful for cropping, portability, light weight, low cost, and an internal focus motor. Having these drawbacks: Bokeh that is not quite acceptable, chromatic aberration up to f/2.8 (which can be corrected in lightroom).

Excellent overall impressions despite the picture's extreme contrast due to having to photograph in low-light settings (no sun, winter forest, dark).

Pros: Aperture, price, weight (light), focal length for crop is excellent Its cons: It is almost impossible to shoot wide open, you have to cover it (for example, I have no problems with an 85mm lens at f / 1.4) 3 at this aperture value, photo post-processing required.

Some pros: Draws a picture beautifully, washes the background nicely, convenient focal length, sharp from f / 2.2, and even at f / 1.8 you can get a decent frame Got cons: Small XA, but they are easy to edit in Lightroom, plastic mount, no stabilizer

Some pros: aperture, sharpness, optimal fixed viewing angle for crop matrix. Its cons: Autofocus sometimes misses, but it's rare, mostly everything is fine.

Has some pros: Aperture, included case and lens hood, high-quality assembly, metal mount, focal length for everyday shooting Its cons: Probably only the lack of a stabilizer, if it can be called a disadvantage.

I am satisfied with the lens, the price is still inadequate, quality ratio, IMHO, loses "people's fifty dollars" AF 50mm f / 1.8D, but for me it's basically AF-S.

In the merits, in principle, Info/obzor-obyektiva-nikon-35mm-f1-8/ because when shooting close-ups, the subject is slightly distorted.

Pros: 35mm is better than 50 believe me more and you don’t need it, since you will shoot 2.8 Its cons: I didn’t notice any shortcomings, except for a little backlash, but this may be a feature of my copy.

A must have for every owner of a cropped Nikon camera! since then I have bought / sold / is as it was, and is, and I'm not going to part with it.

Has some pros: Aperture, with all that it implies in the form of a shallow depth of field. Has cons: shoot a performance or nature with the sun / reflections, water surface / just clothes with some kind of shiny little things turn into a demonstration of chrome!

f Focus up to 5 I pointed it, Sharpness is average. 16-85 and 18-55 It is necessary to take more expensive, so as not to be disappointed or sacrifice autofocus, that's what you need I got the impression that its resolution is less than the matrix can give out and the potential of the camera is not revealed

Extremely specialized, yet it succeeds admirably in its intended role The ability to focus in low light is a major plus for product photography because to the lens's 2.8 aperture. The image has more visual attraction because of its contrasts and its vivacity. Those who need it will understand why I think it's great. Here are some samples of the Samyang 100mm f/2.8 ED UMC Macro Canon EF lens's performance in my hands:

This piece of glass works well for me in conjunction with a Nikon D3100; nevertheless, while I'm shooting inside of a home, I've been utilizing it for over a year, and I even forget that there is no zoom very infrequently.

The following photographs from "Helloween vol.1" were taken with this lens: "35-chka is an ideal option on Fx when shooting in clubs, excellent color reproduction, in portraits, the background is rotated with an annular scale, like the Helios 44 a super lens, Happiness has no limits, MOTO" Karpenko?z=albums12561064

I purchased it, attached it to the Nikon D3100, and attempted to take pictures with it. "Well, I went ahead and bought horror." and even if you look at it on the computer monitor, I shot it from a tripod with a closed-open aperture. However, it turned out that I had replaced my Nikon D3100 with a Nikon D7000, which produces images that are crisp, clear, and incredibly juicy. Photographic example:

I was dissatisfied, as I had anticipated more; here are some of my shots. Com/file/d/0BzkNoEmq5Qn3QmxMOUhfZ3lCSlk/view?usp=sharing (yeah, if you zoom in, you'll see that I was spot on) Com/file/d/0BzkNoEmq5Qn3SXpXOElnYnpaWkk/view?usp=sharing Com/file/d/0BzkNoEmq5Qn3R0c5eEd1aFJMSTA/view?usp=sharing