Header banner
Revain logoHome Page

Reviews

Global ratings 63
  • 5
    49
  • 4
    12
  • 3
    2
  • 2
    0
  • 1
    0

Type of review

Revainrating 4 out of 5

Satisfactory product quality, good price.

He lives happily, works, edits Word, watches 1080p YouTube videos, and plays 4K videos (but only those that are on the device; 4K YouTube can not export). Mother Asus p5ql pro has been working on it since 2008 or 2009, I can't remember precisely when I purchased it. There isn't much more to say about this CPU. Well, how would this be the ideal way to acquire a used computer for $5,000, whether for yourself or for your child? That way, you wouldn't be spending so much time playing games and more

Pros
  • 1. Sincere two cores 2. A frequency of 2.66GHz (as of 2008/9) 3. Enough for work, tanks, and simple daily duties in 2017 4. Overclocking, readily increased to 3.03GHz; I personally chase 4.1GHz, but the work is not very stable; 3.7-9 is its suitable limit.
Cons
  • 1. Well, whatever their current state, the PC assembly on this CPU was good at the time of purchase. 2. However, it can overclock in 2k17 and continues to be a reliable workhorse. hence, none.

This percentage may be found on the mother board for the Asus P5QL PRO. I had almost little time to spare after the purchase, so I overclocked it to 3.6Hz almost immediately. There were no issues, and the temperature did not considerably increase. The Zalman CNPS9700 NT cooler is the only one that can keep it cool. Naturally, in the general sense, this percentage is not for people who are interested in overclocking; yet, it is even important to raise the frequencies on it because this is how…

Pros
  • Value for the money, the ability to overclock, and a convenient socket that poses no difficulties when mounting fans.
Cons
  • The Multiplier Is Locked

Revainrating 4 out of 5

I am not disappointed, the quality is satisfying.

Perfect for watching movies, playing the latest video games, editing images, etc. I have no idea; I don't use it for anything more serious. Using a P45 Platinum (40 at idle, up to 60 under load), I was able to overclock my E8400 E0 to 3.6 GHz. Don't skimp on the air conditioner if you value peace and calm temperatures. This is now the best low-cost option for a powerful home computer.

Pros
  • Consistent, strong acceleration. Has functioned without a hitch for nearly 2 years at this point.
Cons
  • Ages rapidly.

Core 2 Duo 7300 (c) Intel I purchased it in 2009, updated numerous thermal pastes and coolers, but it continues to run games on medium until 2013, at which point I need two more cores to play comfortably, even if I can't keep up with them. In general, I am happy with the purchase and relieved that I won't need to buy a new COMP for another two to three years.

Pros
  • speed, effectiveness, relevance, and survival since 2009
Cons
  • Either I'm blind or they simply don't exist.

Revainrating 4 out of 5

A good product, but having its own defects.

65 candle TDP (heat power) indicated as the detrimental effect coefficient. There is a wide range of temperatures (40° to 100°), but for me, it is nearly totally dependent on the cooler. Despite the fact that I'm confused about silence at the moment and can't decide whether to disable the fan or set it at 4/sec. It's quite improbable that your computer will get hotter than 55 degrees if you keep the fan blowing at a rate of at least 25 revolutions per second (1500 rpm). Check out my analysis…

Pros
  • On a regular voltage, it is effectively adjusted between 2.8 and 3.6. No longer worked for me. While it does slow down in some of my games, it does not slow down in the vast majority of tasks. Or, perhaps, program settings (say, Firefox with a hundred extensions) are to blame for the sluggish performance. Let's simply say that, despite the fact that many interesting farts are not farted from the first games and other platforms using emulsifiers, the best games are not the newest games. This works for me because... Editing (or code) that has been fine-tuned is relegated to the background and forgotten. It is unclear how various new-architecture CPUs generally outperform it. According to Aida-64's data tables, there is a significant performance gap only when the percent is above 80. Some "i7" have 4 or 6 cores, increasing the overall frequency. And I fail to see how claiming that new processors are superior due to a different "architecture" is relevant in this context. There's no show going on at all. Simply state the frequency and core count. Even at 1.74, i5 can't compete with this Duu c 3.52. The improvement in architecture is largely cosmetic, and it is typically negated by excessive overclocking. Instead of improved performance, new software typically necessitates a change in the processor's "format" and associated hardware. See the discussion below for more on heat transfer.
Cons
  • It has 2 thermal sensors that constantly show that each core is at least 54 degrees Fahrenheit! There must be a typo here. On the system map, the average temperature is displayed by the sensor underneath it (starting at 28 degrees Fahrenheit), and he only becomes visible when the temperature goes above 54 degrees.

Revainrating 4 out of 5

A good product, more pros than cons.

In theory, the CPU is fine, but it's not worth the asking price right now. Since a 4-core Phenom II with a motherboard may confidently outperform a C2D e8400 at the same price. But infer what you will, for it will be entirely obsolete in a year and a half. For Intel aficionados, I suggest the i3, which offers higher performance for the same price.

Pros
  • Powerful and dependable 45nm large cache 3000GHz 2 cores
Cons
  • outdated in terms of cost

Revainrating 4 out of 5

The item is of good quality, there is only one minor defect.

sat in front of Pentium 4 630 HT. When I increased the overclock to 3.6 GHz, there was a slight improvement. I choose to get a new core i3 or i5 model. However, it became problematic because a new socket was underneath them, meaning I would also need to purchase a new motherboard. The Core 2 Duo E8400 offered a minimal boost; the performance is marginally inferior to the i3, but for the older socket. While I believe that's plenty, games started to run quickly. In the future, I'll take the…

Pros
  • With a good cooler, it rarely exceeds 50 degrees while under load. Accelerates well up to 3.6 GHz (higher frequencies not tried). Very, very quickly! energy is saved. There are too many things to list. Without include the quad cores, of course, this is most likely the greatest CPU for LGA 775.
Cons
  • dated socket. Further upgrading is not conceivable. Overpriced (If you look at the price of the E8600, you can get an i3 with a motherboard and get a method to further upgrade to an i5, i7, for the same money.)

Revainrating 5 out of 5

The quality is at the highest level, be sure to try it.

Everest's overclocked 4.4 GHz processor lacked the necessary one degree of troyling. Now that I'm using it, I'm enjoying it. Obviously, if you want to overclock this processor, you need to have excellent cooling and better dropsy, but if money is tight, get the cooler master N620 and everything will be OK! I've used for a year at this point. For seven months, overclocking has been stable.

Pros
  • Of course, modern games like GTA IV or Crysis 2 unquestionably require a quad-core processor, but this one still pulls. Asus, well overclocked on motherboards, does not heat up at a typical frequency. Although many other duos slow down, it functions quickly in many Windows apps. Lots of cache is always a plus!
Cons
  • Princepe has good functionality, however brand-new games can lag.

Revainrating 4 out of 5

I like it, thanks for the quality product.

It was a replacement for a Pentium 4 2.8 GHz that I purchased 2.5 years ago. The primary objective was to migrate from an antiquated graphics interface (AGP 8x) to a more up-to-date PCI-E 16x platform. Neither overclocking nor video editing are among my favorite uses for my computer; I use it primarily for entertainment purposes. Back when I was devoting virtually all of my free time to World of Warcraft, I noticed a marked improvement in my productivity overall. In other words, an incremental…

Pros
  • I haven't overclocked it because I'm happy with the performance in normal modes.
Cons
  • Even though it was sufficient at the time of purchase, I noticed a drop in performance in games a year later. It wasn't a brand new model when I bought it, but the same old Pentium 4 served me well for years, and I used to play far more games than I do now.

2008 purchase made to assemble a computer. At that time, I was still playing video games. He then far surpassed my expectations. Excellent price, low operating temperature and power consumption, and fast speed. For the past ten years, this computer has been up and running for me. I've long since stopped playing games since I'm bored with them. The computer on this processor also handles everything else with a bang. simply upgraded RAM.

Pros
  • Price, speed, little heat production, and dependability.
Cons
  • NO

Revainrating 3 out of 5

The product is average, I'm not sure it's worth the money.

This CPU's appeal has waned significantly during the past year and a half. The claim that "all games are not stupid" is false; a video card's processing power is far more crucial. However, even for HD5870 or GTX470, this CPU is embarrassingly underpowered. Moreover, 2 cores should not be overlooked. As of right now, you'll require a minimum of three. The $75 AMD Athlon 440 is faster than this stone without even being overclocked. I'm a little confused by the meaning of "extra" in this context…

Pros
  • The microprocessor has been discontinued.
Cons
  • Many of them exist. In terms of technology, we're still using the tried-and-true 45nm method. The G6950, for instance, can be merged with it in terms of ALL aspects, but at a cost of $1,000 to $1,500 more! All core2duo certified, therefore there's no use in buying new ones.

I was able to overclock it to 4600 MHz in the air, but during the stability test, a blue screen crashed. In principle, it was still feasible to be shamanistic, but I still don't need such an operating frequency, it's already merely sporting interest) I was able to overclock it to 4600 MHz in the air. It has remained at a frequency of 4200 MHz, and while it is operating normally, the temperature ranges from 40 to 45 degrees Celsius (while the temperature outside the window is +30 degrees…

Pros
  • + does not overheat + is incredibly powerful + accelerates very well
Cons
  • I looked for it, but I couldn't find it. It is now considered immorally outdated, but this cannot be considered a flaw in the processor itself.

Revainrating 5 out of 5

One of the best deals, glad I bought this.

E8600 Intel Core 2 Duo Processor. This is a legend about a computer chip, not merely a CPU. Since I first purchased it in August 2009, this rock has consistently kept my drinks icy and has never once caused me to wonder, "is there snot under the lid?" It's a terrible shame that at the end of 2017 I couldn't rely on its capabilities to help me out of a jam. Unlike the E8600, I doubt the next processor purchase will bring me as much joy.

Pros
  • Overclocking possibilities; no need for cooling; high power output -Reliable -Productive The Radeon HD 3870 and Radeon HD 7770 worked with my copy (and you can play with them, albeit at low to medium settings in newer titles).
Cons
  • None. It was a robust answer for its time (2009). Outdated at this time. Socket 775

Revainrating 5 out of 5

One of the best deals, glad I bought this.

In 2008, when I made the purchase, the value was excellent. I was able to get 3.6 GHz mobile with a decent air cooler. I haven't even attempted to get higher yet. Such processors were commonplace in my future workplace. They continue to perform admirably in many areas, including modeling, office work, web browsing, and even some less processor-intensive games. This is a highly effective model.

Pros
  • Low cost, great potential for overclocking, and current utility across a wide range of workloads.
Cons
  • Although the cache is less than the E8x00, the low cost makes up for it.

Revainrating 5 out of 5

Good quality product, I rate this purchase excellent.

It amazed me greatly that I was able to complete all the tests at 4.5 GHz (500x9) on an abit IP35Pro without the need for voltmod or shamanism. Asus P5K Deluxe on mother asus with sorrow in half lasted up to 4.3 GHz further did not want to pass the test for archiving 7zip (osst and 3Dmark passed without issues). I loved how the heat dissipation was almost the same and that it consistently accepts 3.6 without increasing the voltage. It started to drive and hang after switching to a less…

Pros
  • among dual-core processors, the best price/performance/overclocking ratio
Cons
  • The quality of the mother board and power supply has an undue influence on overclocking and heat dissipation. In my opinion, supporters of lower price ranges are less particular.

Revainrating 5 out of 5

The best price for such a product, I will buy more!

My buddies laughed as I patiently saved money for this processor for a half year before letting it sit with me while I waited for the motherboard. In general, the processor is a very cost-effective choice for building a gaming computer; I built a fully functional gaming PC for $15,000 with this chip. just. The processor is the "heart" of the computer, so choose it wisely and with consideration. If you've already made the decision to build your own computer, you should choose a processor first.

Pros
  • E8500 is the model being discussed. Widest memory bus 333MHz, highest frequency, complete cache, low power consumption 65W, and low heat dissipation approximately 51 degrees Celsius. Windows 7's performance rating of 6.6 is excellent.
Cons
  • Not located.

Revainrating 5 out of 5

I am delighted, the product is really worthy.

If you are still interested in purchasing a processor with socket 775, then you should get this one. However, you shouldn't purchase a pentium dual core; instead, you should save up a little bit more money and purchase a core 2 duo; I used both of these processors, and I could tell the difference between them. Due to the fact that I am a gamer and soon 2 cores will no longer be sufficient, I decided to go to an AMD X6 1055T processor instead. In a short amount of time, there will be…

Pros
  • It has a large number of benefits, beginning with its price, which is 4,500, and finishing with its performance. The price is just the beginning. It is reasonable to suppose that it will not pull all games without issues, given that it was published in 2008; nevertheless, there is nothing like it that pulls games such as crysis 2, mafia 2, and gta 4 eflc on high settings, and furthermore, there is not a very strong video card. It works well; first, I overclocked it to 4 GHz, at which point it functioned reasonably steadily; but, after a while, I decided that 3 GHz was plenty for the task at hand, and so I reset it to that speed. passes tests with flying colors and receives a score of 6.6 on Windows 7.
Cons
  • They are nowhere to be found.

Revainrating 5 out of 5

One of the best deals, glad I bought this.

The processor is excellent, it stays cool, and it has adequate power for the price. Overclocking performance scales very well. The overclocking limit is the only real drawback, but it performs better with CBO or extreme cooling. Overall, a fantastic CPU for its price point. But if you can wait, I recommend the E8xxx series, and in particular the E8200 or the E8400. I'm not complaining that I now have one at home, but I am starting to stock up on i7s. As a result of my extensive testing, I am…

Pros
  • Features: + Low heat dissipation + Good performance + 3 MB cache + Typical acceleration + Reasonable price
Cons
  • Due to its low clock speed, overclocking is typically limited to between 4000 and 4200 MHz at a safe voltage. -Voltage increases after the threshold have a diminished effect.

Revainrating 5 out of 5

I am very happy with this purchase, I will advise everyone!

Patriot PDC24G6400ELK RAM, Asus P5K Pro motherboard. It quickly accelerates to 3.6 GHz on a boxed cooler, but the temperature already increases to 69C (in the room, 28). This is not much, so it is perfectly possible to run it continuously, but the cooler's noise is already audible and obtrusive (the speed is manually set to 90%). I will never switch to a 4-core processor (at least not in the foreseeable future) because of the performance. In the worst-case scenario, I'll purchase a Typhoon…

Pros
  • performance, possibility for overclocking, and TDP
Cons
  • -no

Revainrating 5 out of 5

The right product for me, there were no problems.

The percentage is really good, and the overclocking is comparable to that of certain I3 and I5 models. The most consistent form that iron could provide, in my experience. Various advantages: Overclocked, working consistently at a frequency of 3.8 for several years, the cooler is not a boxed but inexpensive 30-35 bucks, an Asus P5K motherboard, 4 gigabytes of RAM, a 120g SSD vidyuha HD6870 (also chasing 10%, artifacts are no longer stably chasing), and Windows 7 Ultimate, everything flies, the…