Pros
- + great performance + low heat dissipation (in comparison to competition). In the future, I'll include
Cons
- I utilize the third assembly day because I haven't yet been able to locate it. I'll add it as I use it if it shows up.
Pros
- Performance
Cons
- Price
Pros
- It flies and does not get very hot with LSS.
Cons
- How can you not like
Pros
- Performance
Cons
- Temperature
Pros
- speed
Cons
- remember to heat up
Pros
- works great in render. in conjunction with prof. Vidyahoy generally fire
Cons
- I got married. reboots.
Pros
- When compared to the 3950x, the system has improved responsiveness. Some slowdowns and unexpected stutters in the user interface have been eliminated. When compared to the 3950x, the performance of the system has not improved by a significant amount. The compilation speed is unaffected by plus or minus. The actual frequency without PBO when operating on one core when under load is increased to 4.975 GHz. Let's move on to the next topic, which is games. Even though I don't play video games very often, I've noticed that the frames per second (fps) in the games I do play have increased substantially, and the gameplay has become more fluid.
Cons
- We observe temperatures that are 10–15 degrees higher while having the same TPD and CBO as the 3950x, but without having the PBO mode on. Which can reach a maximum of ninety degrees. The memory controller in the 3950x and this machine are identical. When it comes to cost, it is even more expensive than the 3950x when you first buy it.
Pros
- Count of cores and threads in use. Performance.
Cons
- It's a shame, but there is no support for DDR5 or PCI Express 5. (Considering that this CPU was released in a different year than DDR5 and PCI Express 5, it's unreasonable to expect support for these technologies.) It is not easy to locate a typical mother board that is compatible with this CPU socket. On the other hand, this is primarily AMD's issue.
Pros
- -Highly efficient in terms of the dissipation of heat
Cons
- Very few processes are able to make use of all of the threads that are accessible.
Pros
- It would be fantastic if the processor had a factory-installed turbo boost that really worked.
Cons
- No good when using the stock turbocharger.
Pros
- Bye bye
Cons
- Not even close.
Pros
- - Display of Skill I've been trying to think of something else to emphasize, but it seems like there's really only one benefit: Likewise, I have no complaints about the procedure.
Cons
- - There's a ton of garbage with the configuration, and AMD's platform isn't even close to being as user-friendly as Intel's. Limited PCIe ports; overheats easily; Overclocking is just okay; 4.5 GHz is barely reached. Do not believe the tall tales in the comments about some 4.9 - 5 GHz (in the mode of individual cores - m / b) as I was unable to achieve a frequency higher than 4.5 by simply setting the desired frequency (perhaps the Asus X570 does not know how to separate the cores, and in general somehow very little overclocker settings, strange).
Pros
- Powerful, 32 threads versus 24 for i9. Price. Overclocking
Cons
- Hot.
Pros
- 32 threads! Rendering in 3D software became much more fun after the 12 threads I had.
Cons
- It's getting warm. Before that, I worked for 5 years on Intel i7-5820k. Cooling tower Red Hat. The temperature at 100% load did not rise above 60-65. True, he did not chase above 3.8. A new percentage with the same, current, new tower, easily jumps over 75. And I used the utility from Asus, it overclocked it to 4.5, but in the same tasks it began to instantly heat up to 90-92. Well, yes, the render went another 30% faster, but I figured that it would be better if the render went slower than I would go again for a new stone. I reset the BIOS to default and got the coveted 65 degrees in full load. It is almost 4 times faster than the 5820 anyway.
Pros
- the best percentage for today for work and not only within the average budget.
Cons
- price, but this has already been discussed many times. I was ready to take it for 90, as I clearly understand why I need it. for toys, of course, you can take younger models.
Pros
- Good boost per core (after tuning). Moderate heat dissipation (in stock). High specific performance per core and there are already 16 of them!
Cons
- It was very difficult to set up the RAM for stable operation at least in the 3600Mhz mode (I spent more than one day on this .) ! RAM - 64Gb gskill neo 3800CL16 (4x16Gb; 1.40V) in 1:1 controller mode refused to run at 3800Mhz at all! In the 1:2 mode, the memory started up at a frequency of 3800Mhz with the declared main timings without problems (I did not touch the secondary ones), with a voltage of 1.43V in the mother's BIOS . Draw your conclusions .
