Header banner
Revain logoHome Page

Reviews

Global ratings 149
  • 5
    77
  • 4
    28
  • 3
    21
  • 2
    8
  • 1
    15

Type of review

Revainrating 2 out of 5

Poor product, the quality is below average.

I have been driving this rubber for the fourth winter already. The first two winters of joy knew no bounds: good handling on snowy and icy roads, it doesn’t go into a skid, of course without fanaticism, it slows down perfectly, both on ice and on snow. But in the third season, problems began - literally within a month, three wheels began to pass through the spikes. I had to change all the wheels into cameras. tire for ejection. And this is with a total mileage of about 30 thousand km.

Pros
  • Good handling, excellent braking on ice.
Cons
  • Small service life.

Revainrating 4 out of 5

The product is really good, Im glad I bought it.

I bought it because of the low price, as I installed it, I immediately noticed a very strong rumble, the tires did not roll for long somewhere around 500-700 km, then I started driving as usual, the rumble of the rubber dropped significantly after about 3000 thousand km. Then it became noisy like all tires, quite comfortable. Since I put it in the fall and there was mud and then snow, I’ll immediately write deep mud and virgin snow is not her element, but in the city you can always leave the…

Pros
  • Good behavior on asphalt, ice, rolled snow.
Cons
  • Noise for the first few thousand miles.

Revainrating 5 out of 5

Best thing for the money, glad I did it.

The winter season is over, all winter every day I went to Cordiant Snow Cross. Bought new ones in the fall. Now, after changing to the summer one, I checked each tire after the season - only on one wheel the loss of 2 spikes, the rest are 100% like new! Moreover, I went without sparing especially. I definitely recommend. I don't know what will happen after the 2nd season, but the first season is excellent.

Pros
  • Execution quality Price Good on ice They show themselves well on dry pavement and in positive weather in the rain
Cons
  • They drive badly on a rut and snow porridge (throws a car) Noisy

Revainrating 5 out of 5

I am amazed at how well the product is made, just magically!

long chose from the budget. I have been looking for these for a long time in my city. So far I have not seen snow, but I can say for sure that the tires do not make noise. Although I don’t drive a TAZ, the Shumka is normal. For winter tires, the noise is quite normal. the tread says the tires are for slush. Spikes are enough. planted well. I am very glad that ours were finally able to make normal, inexpensive tires.

Pros
  • Do not make noise
Cons
  • did not notice for not long use

Revainrating 5 out of 5

I can't stop being happy with the purchase, a very good deal!

I compare with a number of spikes GOODYEAR, Gislaved NordFrost and Cordiant Polar 2 (not a spike). All the above-mentioned European rubbers are good in their own way and I can’t say anything bad, except for their cost. Gislaved deserves special honors. But after purchasing the Snow Cross tire (for meager money), not a single member of our family doubted for a second that we had made the right choice. Absolutely nothing lost to their predecessors. Well, maybe in handling at high speed. Since we

Pros
  • throughput and braking performance
Cons
  • running-in features that cannot be neglected (400-600 km. )

Revainrating 4 out of 5

The right product for me, the price suited me.

Strong noise when I installed new ones, after 200 km the noise decreased, but still not very comfortable compared to my past Gislaved and Kumho, the contrast will probably be even stronger relative to the top brands. Tires are good for the money, let's see what happens after the first season. Has some pros: budget, Good tread pattern copied from top tires. Works well on ice and snow Perfectly balanced on 4 wheels, more than 45g each was not on 235 / 65R17 Its cons: The noise is quite loud and…

Revainrating 4 out of 5

I am satisfied, the purchase is quite successful.

I didn’t choose tires for the Santa Fe Classic for a long time, because the money was limited, for an amount of not more than 5000s. for 1 one wheel R16 225/70 it is very difficult to find something worthwhile. After reading the reviews and test drive of reputable publications, my choice fell on Cordiant Snow Cross, this rubber took 6-9 places among expensive and very expensive rubber. At first, the tires were very noisy, but after the first 1000 km. the noise disappeared. Behavior on the road

Pros
  • Price quality
Cons
  • Yes, there are no serious comments

Revainrating 3 out of 5

The product is average, Im not sure its worth the money.

I got it with the car at the end of the season, so I didn’t use it in harsh conditions. But the behavior on the pavement, both dry and wet, did not like it at all. Adds negativity and creepy noise. For the new season, I would definitely change to another rubber, if I had not changed the car.

Revainrating 5 out of 5

Quality is top notch, happy with everything.

Normal winter tires. I drive every day - around the city, and around the region, and in the rain, and in the snow, and in the ice. I have no complaints about this tire. Spikes after 1 winter are almost all in place, no more noisy than more expensive brands. It goes well on wet roads. No problems, do not listen to anyone - you can safely take it.

Revainrating 3 out of 5

Overall it's not bad, but I expected more.

I haven’t bought this rubber yet, but I decided to write here, because. copywriters who write custom reviews cause outrage. People, well, just think: how many times have you caught yourself thinking of running to your computer and writing a laudatory review faster, because you bought, for example, a kettle and, lo and behold, it boils water! !? ? If the rubber rides, then for this it is bought, why praise it then? : in fairness, I must say that don’t focus too much on bad reviews either - these

Pros
  • Don't know
Cons
  • Don't know

Revainrating 5 out of 5

Fits the description completely, very satisfying.

I bought tires for the first season from lack of money. After Goodyear, she didn’t show herself as a standard, BUT, she served faithfully, faithfully, all winter, lost a spike on the drive wheels and went to the garage (from where she was stolen). Became the choice of new tires. There was money this time, but after reading the reviews, I realized that the Cordiant was very good (in one, the spikes fly out on the Nordman, in the other, the cord cuts on the curb on the gislaved, etc. ). I thought

Pros
  • price, riding on ice, snow with ice, wet ice, deep snow (10 cm+)
Cons
  • bad braking on bare pavement

Revainrating 1 out of 5

Return my money! Disgusting product and poor quality.

Do not buy. Tires do not work out winter conditions, only along the streets with reagents and ride in positive temperatures. They continue to lower the rim, the second time I went to a tire fitting, but already a repair one, they said the tire itself was bad, even a new one, it was dubious and did not hold the road, they recommended changing it. Total additional costs due to these tires: +10 for a crumpled door after driving into the side of the road, + 2 for repair tire fitting of 2 wheels

Cons
  • Dubeyut already at -10. From here, the problems do not hold the road and poison the rim. On polished fresh snow, the road is not kept at all. I already went to the side of the road on them. At the tire shop they said right away if the money allows you to change it.

Revainrating 4 out of 5

I recommend to buy, the product is of high quality.

Before buying, I read a lot of reviews, both good and bad. When buying, I was primarily guided by the price. I did not expect to get at this price a hack 7 whose pattern was copied on a snowcross. But she behaves quite worthy, both on packed snow and on an icy track. The behavior is quite predictable. The directional stability of the rubber is good. sticks very well. Before that, there was haka 1 and kumho KV 22. Cordiant is much better in comparison. During the season flew 1 spike on the right

Pros
  • price, quality of studding, coupling properties.
Cons
  • at first it makes noise, then either the noise becomes less or you just get used to it. After summer tires it seems too soft (roll).

Revainrating 1 out of 5

It can't be worse! A waste of money.

tire usage time - 1 season, i. e. 3 months, all the flaws appeared on the whole set, although they were bought in different stores and in different batches, the rumble appears so that the sensations speak of a rocket launch, or they removed all the mufflers on the car. I used it on a Matiz, according to my passport, the pressure was 2 atm. , It rows forward well, but with the slightest wind, or when cornering, or in a rut, there is no grip on the road, be it ice or snow. before that there was

Pros
  • price
Cons
  • noisy, unstable to transverse shifts, spikes quickly fly out, and those that did not fly out fall inside, as a result, service is needed - repair

Revainrating 4 out of 5

The goods are normal, money is not wasted!

Car - Suzuki Liana Sedan 4x4. For almost 10 years, we have been served by magnificent and quiet Gislaved NF3, but the time and mileage of more than 55,000 km, as well as heels of punctures, two side cuts have done their job. Rubber hardened, cracked, the wheels became impossible to balance. But! Each wheel was missing no more than 15-20 spikes, and the wheels still rowed perfectly in snow and ice. And on the 3rd day I changed them to brand new Cordiant Snow Cross 185/65 R14. And immediately…

Pros
  • Price, Driving performance, Domestic manufacturer
Cons
  • Very loud noise

In general, I'm happy with the tires. Has some pros: After I turned around on the track, I decided to change my bald tires, there was a 175/65/14 chaise, I bought a cordiant of the same size, but the tread is already 2 cm compared to the chaise. After replacing the rubber, I did not believe that a car could drive in the snow like that , I rode all evening through snowdrifts on the bottom of the car, the car didn’t sit down anywhere, even downhill (although the snow was loose) the car began to…

Revainrating 2 out of 5

Unsatisfactory, upset with this product.

Assessing my own purchase.With its pros: Stable in both snow and water. On ice, not yet tested. Has some cons: Very noisy on the pavement, as if you were driving a KAMAZ.

Revainrating 5 out of 5

Great product, best quality.

Car Plymouth Breeze, automatic, front-wheel drive. I bought in the dimension 195/65/R15 for 2200s. for a tire. Having seen enough terrible weather forecasts about snowfalls, I quickly changed my shoes, as a result I drove for 2 months on bare asphalt. Rubber is designed for operation at low temperatures, at positive temperatures it buzzes terribly, but the Amtel is quieter and the car floats on the road. In cold weather, the noise from the rubber decreases, the control becomes clearer. On…

Pros
  • Low price, excellent quality, excellent traction, quite adequate noise level.
Cons
  • hums strongly at positive temperatures on asphalt

Revainrating 4 out of 5

It was a reasonable purchase, I will order more.

I skated one season on Cordiant Snow Cross 215/65 R16 102T, they stood on Qashqai. There were no questions about controllability, about noise too, but trouble with spikes. During the season flew 10 percent and all of the central row.

Revainrating 5 out of 5

A great option for this money, I definitely recommend it!

Decided to unsubscribe because he chose the reviews. Skated the winter without worries 205/55 R16, front-wheel drive. At first I thought it would be necessary to drive more carefully at least 500 km at first, but it didn’t work out as soon as possible, the habit is ineradicable. I changed my shoes the other day, a detailed examination of winter tires revealed: all the spikes on 4 tires, except for one, are in place ! ! Rear tires - ideal spikes drowned as expected. The front ones, apparently…

Pros
  • price, profile, court, spikes. .
Cons
  • Lamelias are clogged with pebbles in the spring . .