Header banner
Revain logoHome Page

Reviews

Global ratings 203
  • 5
    136
  • 4
    27
  • 3
    10
  • 2
    19
  • 1
    11

Type of review

Revainrating 4 out of 5

I'm completely satisfied with the product, it works.

I bought this miracle, having read and seen enough of everything and everyone! I was impressed by the number of spikes and their grip, and since the developer made the exit from our yard to the road through a small hill (which is almost always icy), the spikes are what I really needed. Especially since the wife also got behind the wheel while pregnant (experienced in general). Tires arrived fresh. I took 1.4L 185/65 15 for Rio. SHE REALLY SCARED! The car did not obey the steering wheel and had…

Pros
  • hook Braking Handling on ice, in yards not cleared of snow
Cons
  • In near-zero temperatures during the break-in "floats". Very scary!

Revainrating 5 out of 5

The perfect purchase for me, exactly what I was looking for!

The negative about this rubber, it seems, is written by those who immediately try to anneal it from the purchase, without running in and without "shave" it. Or I expect from it on snow and ice the same grip as from good summer tires in the summer, which cannot be in principle. These tires are VERY "hairy" new. And until these technological hairs are shaved off, the car floats noticeably even with smooth changeovers. Therefore, for these tires, the initial run-in is STRICTLY MANDATORY - no more

Pros
  • Introductory: Machine - 1.7 tons, permanent all-wheel drive (70% traction in the rear, 30% in front), 200 hp. Dimension - 205/55 R16 Driving style - active, fast, with smooth maneuvering and braking. Excellent stability and braking, both on dry and icy pavement, in including at high speeds. The handling and braking is noticeably better than the previous 3rd version of the X-Ice North. ABS, compared to the 3rd generation, works less often and is not as aggressive. The noise of the spikes is not annoying, though it turned out to be no more, and maybe less, than in the previous version, although the number of spikes has increased by 2.5 times.
Cons
  • In my opinion - no. Excellent studded tires that work well on dry pavement.

Revainrating 5 out of 5

One of the best deals, glad I bought this.

Its pros: Opened up new horizons, riding on coasting on full drive uphill from the hill in a straight line became a pleasure. After the dmv2 bridge, the sidewall seemed more elastic, but comfort is present, the rubber itself is soft. In the car, shaking feels more noble. As soon as I changed my shoes, it felt like driving on mud tires, but with every kilometer of run this feeling is getting smaller, at speed the rumble is only reflected, from the wall or cars standing along the road, so it’s no

Revainrating 5 out of 5

I am amazed at how well made the product is, just magical!

1. Mileage on tires 195/65 R15 about 3000 km on am VW Golf 6 under various conditions (from +10 С asphalt / wet asphalt / aquaplaning - 0С snow-salt porridge - up to -16 С snow / asphalt / snow-salt porridge); 2. Run-in was carried out for the first ~ 700 km in a gentle mode. For the first ~100 km, driving on this rubber was comparable to driving "on a tank", the vibrations were extremely strong in a relatively weakly vibration-loaded VW Golf 6 with good sound insulation. The noise level…

Pros
  • The level of grip on any surface is high (snow, ice, snow / salt, wet asphalt, asphalt); Low noise level after running in ~ (300-500) km.
Cons
  • Not optimal dependence of the coefficient of friction of the tire on the angle of rotation of the wheel.

Revainrating 4 out of 5

Not a bad product, quite normal quality.

Not bad tires, but there was an experience of simultaneous operation with the Hakka 9 and . Michelin is inferior to the Hakka 9! In the summer Michelin Pilot Sport 4 is the best available option, but in winter it's still Hakka and it's Hakka 9! It is more predictable in axle drift, it is more tenacious when braking, it has better flotation. Yes, Michelin 4th tires are not bad either, but after operating the two previous cars on winter Hakka 8 and two real cars, one of which is on Michelin 4 and

Pros
  • Silence of operation
Cons
  • Insufficient clarity of control

Revainrating 5 out of 5

Great quality, happy with it one hundred percent!

I really liked the rubber. Quiet, holds the road, there are no problems on the ice, rowing in the snow. I skated 10 thousand per season, on the Duster, mostly city-highway. All spikes in place, minimal wear 11/11/21 As a result, skated 3 seasons (about 30 thousand km.). Only 2 spikes fell off 4 wheels. The rubber would have left at least the same amount if I had not changed the car.

Pros
  • Quiet

Revainrating 5 out of 5

Just super, the product is made wonderfully, very satisfied.

My first car, winter tires, respectively, too: so I like everything, I don’t see any shortcomings. I chose for a long time and tediously, reading reviews, etc. in the end I decided to take the Michelin, because. firstly, a familiar taxi driver rode bears in winter and praised them very much (and who else to ask for opinions if not a professional who doesn’t get out from behind the wheel), secondly, he got into a promotion (park with Michelin) or something like that spirit. Thirdly, I bribed the

Pros
  • All
Cons
  • Didn't find it.

Revainrating 5 out of 5

I didn't expect the quality to be so high.

I took 195/65/15. Ford Focus 2 car. There was almost no winter in Hong Kong, so it was not possible to test it thoughtfully in winter weather conditions. But the operating tests from minus 5 to +10 (on dry and wet roads) are abundant. 1000 kilometers traveled around the city (rolled tires) Then he went to Hong Kong and Hong Kong. Mileage 11 thousand. The spikes are ALL in place, on dry asphalt the handling is excellent (at a speed of more than 140 km, it starts to "float" a little). The braking

Pros
  • Handling, short braking distance on ice, stability on dry pavement.
Cons
  • Noisy

Revainrating 5 out of 5

A very high-quality product, I take it not for the first time.

In short ., then it would have been 5 times already, I got into an accident on any other rubber. Have experience! And so, rubber inspires confidence on the road, but be vigilant and choose the right speed mode and do not rely on the fact that it can do everything. In loose snow, it slips, ice clings well, strongly packed snow keeps confidently! Good luck to all road users!

Pros
  • for 10,000 km not a single spike has fallen out, the tires are in perfect condition. Very soft, Even the hairs on the rear wheels are still in place!
Cons
  • very noisy on pavement

Revainrating 1 out of 5

Think twice before you buy-the product is disgusting.

This is trash, not rubber! I fell for the tests (I think I bought them) and replaced the tired Hakkapellite 8 and was immediately shocked! And when on the highway I almost flew under a truck on this rubber, so to speak, I felt sorry for the money spent! On dry pavement, any movement of the steering wheel is accompanied by the dangling of the car (there was such a thing on an old Mercedes without a rear suspension) and this is with a 50 profile! Hakkapellitta on profile 55 did not allow even a…

Pros
  • Quiet, brand
Cons
  • Chatting on dry pavement! The car is not steerable at all.

Revainrating 5 out of 5

I am very happy with this purchase, I will advise everyone!

Excellent tires! I myself have always set the pressure on other tires to 2.0 (with the prescribed 2.2), I pumped these up to 2.0 - it’s scary to accelerate above 90 . it throws from side to side all over the road, the steering wheel does not linger in place at all, I was upset at first with the purchase, but then he pumped up nitrogen to 2.3 (it shrinks to 2.2 over time) and everything fell into place. Handling has become many times better, it doesn’t float at all now, on the highway at 130 you

Pros
  • 1. The quietest I've ever driven. 2. Excellent grip on asphalt, snow, porridge (did not drive on clean ice). 3. Excellent rowing in snowdrifts. 4. Soft and comfortable. 5.
Cons
  • 1. Strong dependence of tire characteristics on pressure! 2. ABS works a little earlier (car weighing 1270kg)

Revainrating 4 out of 5

My impression of the purchase is good, buy it.

Pretty quiet, there is a rumble, but not critical, in the snow it’s generally quiet. If it were not for the behavior on snowy asphalt, then excellent tires. Tiguan 4wd Got pros: There is nothing to complain about in terms of braking, it’s good on dry pavement, even better on hard snow crust, on asphalt under snow (at least 2 centimeters) - it’s already bad . well, like on ordinary rubber Some cons: I described about braking on a snowy track. Similarly poor and lateral stability on a snowy…

Revainrating 4 out of 5

I like the product, the quality did not disappoint.

I can’t say anything about traction, but not because I’m so ignorant, but because of reasonable driving: even where I allow huge speeding, I do it that way and where it’s safe for me and others. On frank ice and generally in slippery conditions, I try to drive without sudden movements, and slow down smoothly. This is probably why it is difficult for me to talk about the difference in the behavior of tires if I am not a tester and have not tested them to the limit. And I consider all reviews FOR

Pros
  • you can go
Cons
  • noisy, which is logical with such a tread and spikes (see below)

Revainrating 3 out of 5

Performs its functions, nothing unusual.

Tires XIN3 were purchased along with a new car (Polo). After the first winter, spikes began to be lost. Driving style - penny, running in the "vegetable" mode 500 km. I found out that this model had a marriage of spikes - they simply broke off, the base remained in the tire. I turned to Michelin, they gave me the contacts of a dealer who can be contacted for a complaint, which was done. The claim was approved, however, the dealer reported that the XIN3 was out of stock. When asked if there…

Pros
  • Dear sirs, in this post we will talk about how the manufacturer's warranty works on the example of X-ICE North 3 (XIN3) tires and the experience of using X-ICE North 4 (XIN4), perhaps it will be important for you.
Cons
  • In the comments.

Revainrating 3 out of 5

Average quality, not a great product.

I thought sensibly: I’m not a racer, I drive carefully, you can take something simpler than it was. And before that, there was a Nokian hakapelita 7 for 5 years. I was surprised that now, even when driving slowly around the yard, he drives a car, a real feeling that you are moving in some kind of jelly. With more or less fast driving (40 kilometers), drift is felt when turning. Road conditions are the same as all life: a small porridge of snow with reagents on the pavement. In general, I’m…

Pros
  • Purely visually, I liked the tread, I thought that it would be passable enough in the snow
Cons
  • The car behaves like jelly even when driving very slowly around the yard (octavia a7). With small maneuvers, it sways in all directions.

Revainrating 5 out of 5

I'm amazed! It was definitely worth the money!

I am sure that there will be no problems in warranty support either. Hopefully, however, this will not be necessary. Pros: Worked great. The best price at the moment, the delivery time is exactly observed. Promptly responded by phone and through WA to all questions about rubber with the provision of photos confirming the date and country of production. Got cons: Claim to the Market, but not to the seller - the possibility of contacting the supplier on questions of interest is not implemented…

Revainrating 5 out of 5

The best price for such a product, I will buy more!

This year (autumn-winter 2022) the weather was completely weird. Snow, rain and so on for several days. However, I was very surprised how the car behaves on ice, I have not driven so confidently before. I didn’t drive in deep snow because there is no snow yet. I will say this: Most likely I was satisfied with the purchase. Tires 225-60-17, price 9690, sportage four-wheel drive, automatic.

Pros
  • Excellent grip on ice. This is probably the most important plus in this rubber (my opinion).
Cons
  • Noise, price, lateral drift are all within the normal range. The track (asphalt) at 80 km / h intensifies the noise-rumble, then disappears. At 100 km / h it floats on asphalt, you have to taxi. All this was on rubber that was less than 500 km. I hope after the break it will be better.

Revainrating 5 out of 5

I definitely recommend buying, I didnt notice any disadvantages.

for 23 t. km. in Hong Kong and the Hong Kong region flew 5 spikes from 4 wheels. front left - 2, front right - 0, back left - 0, back right - 3. Foltz polo car, there were sharp starts and sharp braking on different surfaces, including dry pavement, and on snow and ice, sometimes I dabbled with the handbrake. But at the beginning of operation, I ran in tires, the first 700-800 km. run no more than 80 km / h. then another 700-800 km. run no more than 100 km / h.

Pros
  • good handling on any surface at reasonable speeds (rolled up to 160 km)
Cons
  • This is not a drawback, rather it is a feature of this rubber. At first, there is a rumble from rubber instead of the usual rustle due to rubber antennae, but they quickly fly off and the rumble goes away, a rustle comes, quiet enough for so many spikes.